Shutterstock
Perplexed businessman has to choose as holds different paper documents in both hands.

Batch vs. Continuous: When to Make the Switch

April 28, 2025
Continuous processing offers advantages in yield, waste reduction and footprint — but it’s not always the best fit for every plant.

Batch processes play a crucial role in the production of various specialty chemicals. For certain operations, including those with small product volumes, strict tracking requirements and chemistries that can share capital assets, the flexibility offered by batch processing is invaluable. As demands on the manufacturing industry continue to evolve, however, small and midsize manufacturers may want to consider transitioning to continuous processing. 

Rising raw material costs, supply chain challenges and shorter lead-time objectives are driving manufacturers to look for ways to control costs and increase yield. In addition, labor-intensive processes have become more difficult to manage in the face of ongoing labor shortages. Producers are considering process-intensification techniques to lower operating costs, reduce waste and increase quality control. Process intensification often leads to designs that include continuous processing.

Continuous processes can be more efficient and productive than batch processes. Continuous processes make more productive use of capital by avoiding the frequent production halts that occur with batch processing, such as batch transfers between equipment and clean-ups between batches. This allows continuous processes to utilize smaller equipment, leading to a smaller physical footprint. The continuous process also eliminates the high heat and cooling requirements associated with the restart of each batch and therefore can have a smaller energy infrastructure to support the operations. 

But realizing the benefits of continuous processing requires a commitment to process development and an investment in process validation, lab and pilot plant testing and new equipment. Before making the transition, it’s essential to develop a comprehensive understanding of the process chemistry, along with the potential advantages and challenges associated with modifying the production approach.

When Batch Processing is Better

Continuous processing offers benefits for many types of reactions, but it is not always the optimal choice. Batch processing frequently utilizes diverse types and sizes of equipment, such as tank reactors, agitators and mixers, making it particularly suitable for manufacturing multiple types of products. If the existing equipment is versatile and plants are using them efficiently, switching to continuous processing may not be worth the expense. This could apply to manufacturers producing small volumes of products that do not require dedicated equipment, allowing the vessels to serve multiple purposes. If the process operating cost savings can’t justify new equipment, maintaining the existing batch process is the better financial decision. 

When to Consider Continuous Processing

For manufacturers wanting to expand production volumes or increase reaction yields or selectivity, transitioning to continuous processing can deliver significant economic advantages. For logistics optimization, continuous processing can enable distributed production, which reduces order fulfillment cycle time. The smaller footprint and utility requirements associated with continuous processes can make it possible to establish distributed production at a site nearby or within the customer facility, reducing logistic transfer challenges and transportation costs.

Continuous processing can minimize losses associated with batch operations, such as waste generated during start-up, shutdown and equipment purging. It also can produce higher yields from costly raw materials while simultaneously reducing process waste through material recycling, such as the recycle of large volumes of solvents or ballast gas.  

These processing changes can provide safer and more efficient working conditions for operational staff as well. Continuous processes with higher levels of automation reduce the need for lengthy batch start-up, shutdown and material-transfer procedures. For example, continuous reactors can offer significantly improved heat and mass-transfer characteristics that control energetic reactions and can boost yield and selectivity. For processes that involve highly reactive materials, continuous processing reduces the quantities of hazardous substances through the use of smaller equipment and therefore smaller volumes of in-process inventory, supporting inherently safe design principles. 

How to Transition from Batch to Continuous Processing

Changing from batch to continuous processing requires a thorough understanding of reaction chemistry and the possible advantages of process modifications. Internally, this entails establishing a process-development team that is knowledgeable in unit operations for continuous processing and creating facility space for validating the proposed process or working with a third-party expert in process development and optimization. 

The redesign process begins with analyzing the reaction variables to understand how continuous processing will impact the overall system. This involves defining the pressure, temperature and residence time operating window for the reaction. Also, an understanding of the side reactions and impurities generation is needed to define appropriate separation operations to meet the product quality requirements. This information can be used to evaluate the process performance and determine if they can be improved in a continuous process. Developing a detailed technology implementation plan, including several process concepts, is essential. These concepts can be modeled to compare their economic and sustainability impacts to select the optimal process.

Validating Key Process Technologies

The next step is to validate the chemistry and key process technologies in the lab to define a pilot-plant design and the key process variables that must be addressed. This includes how changes to temperature, flow rate or pressure influence equipment selection and system design. High-pressure, acidic environments and byproducts can require specialized materials that increase construction costs. 

The most viable process is selected for pilot-scale testing based on the model and lab results. The new process is demonstrated at a pilot plant scale to derisk the program and validate product quality and economic parameters. The pilot plant verifies yield, selectivity and other performance metrics while providing empirical data on process components and physical properties that may raise safety concerns during commercialization.

For companies utilizing batch operations, exploring alternative processes to improve productivity or expand capacity starts with evaluating the process chemistry and identifying any advantages that can be achieved with continuous processes. Use modeling tools to evaluate potential projects and technologies for economic viability and to create a framework for testing and analysis. By investing in process development and working with trusted R&D partners, companies can achieve safer, more efficient operations with consistent product output. ⊕

About the Author

John P. Dever | Chief Technology Officer

Dr. John P. “Jack” Dever is executive vice president and chief technology officer at AVN Corporation. Dr. Dever has more than 40 years of experience in chemical engineering, holds several patents, was recognized with the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) 2023 Lawrence B. Evans award in Chemical Engineering Practice, inducted into the Academy of Engineers at West Virginia University in 2021, and elected as an AIChE Fellow in 2020. Dr. Dever received a bachelor of science and a master of science in chemical engineering from West Virginia University, and he received a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the University of Notre Dame.

Sponsored Recommendations

Many facilities handle dangerous processes and products on a daily basis. Keeping everything under control demands well-trained people working with the best equipment.
Enhance the training experience and increase retention by training hands-on in Emerson's Interactive Plant Environment. Build skills here so you have them where and when it matters...
See how Rosemount™ 625IR Fixed Gas Detector helps keep workers safe with ultra-fast response times to detect hydrocarbon gases before they can create dangerous situations.
The Micro Motion 4700 Coriolis Transmitter offers a compact C1D1 (Zone 1) housing. Bluetooth and Smart Meter Verification are available.