Expert Says Safety Regulations Haven’t Made Us Safer

May 18, 2017

Well time got away from me again and I am now just addressing the process safety webinar I moderated last month. But I am at least within the 30-day window of the event (it took place on April 18.) It was the second installment of our Process Safety series and our speaker, Dr. Sam Mannan, Regents Professor in the Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering at Texas A&M University and Director of the Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center, once again delivered on the topic in his no-holds-barred approach.

The topic of this event was Enforcement and Operational Discipline. Specifically, Dr. Mannan stated that regulations must be science-based and take into account all the data available as well as practical factors. However, once a regulation is developed, clear and systematic methods must be developed for comprehensive enforcement.

First he answered the question: What are the driving forces for process safety?

According to Mannan, if you go back to the 1970s and '80s, things were quite a bit different than they are now. Processes were much simpler; we used very few exotic or toxic chemicals. But things have changed dramatically.

Mannan’s driving forces for process safety:

  • Growing population
  • Rising standard of living
  • Risk perception
  • Society’s choices
  • The need for constructive dialogue -- we as a society need to look out for how we avoid these pitfalls.

“We started our current journey on regulations in 1990 as far as process safety regulation is concerned,” says Mannan. “And so clearly one might ask, what progress have we made, based on these regulations or have we made any progress? In answering this question, what I can tell you is that a jury is still out.

“We really can't say with any degree of certainty or understanding whether or not we are getting better or we are getting worse.”

Mannan says there is a need for a national hazardous materials incident surveillance system.

“I think it's paramount that if we are going to have a regulation, we base it on science, we base it on data, we base it on understanding what the ramifications are. And along with that we need to make sure that the costs justify the risks that we are reducing. We cannot spend exorbitant amounts of money which reduce only a small amount of risk. We have to justify it based on the amount of risk that is being reduced.”

To hear more on Mannan’s approach to process safety, watch the on-demand version of this webinar. You can also download a complete transcript of the presentation, including the Q&A at the end.

Sponsored Recommendations

Keys to Improving Safety in Chemical Processes (PDF)

Many facilities handle dangerous processes and products on a daily basis. Keeping everything under control demands well-trained people working with the best equipment.

Get Hands-On Training in Emerson's Interactive Plant Environment

Enhance the training experience and increase retention by training hands-on in Emerson's Interactive Plant Environment. Build skills here so you have them where and when it matters...

Managing and Reducing Methane Emission in Upstream Oil & Gas

Measurement Instrumentation for reducing emissions, improving efficiency and ensuring safety.

Micro Motion 4700 Coriolis Configurable Inputs and Outputs Transmitter

The Micro Motion 4700 Coriolis Transmitter offers a compact C1D1 (Zone 1) housing. Bluetooth and Smart Meter Verification are available.