2007 Vaaler Awards

Jan. 3, 2008
Three developments earn Vaaler Awards for their value to the chemical industry. They bested a large number of entries, based on their technological significance, novelty or uniqueness, and breadth of application.

Keeping plants running smoothly and efficiently never has been easy — and it’s gotten a lot tougher in recent years. Indeed, it’s undoubtedly fair to say that the U.S. chemical industry faces unprecedented challenges to remain competitive. Taking advantage of new products and services certainly can help. But which are the most noteworthy of the countless offerings that have come onto the market? This year’s Vaaler Awards winners surely are at the forefront.

Every other year since 1964, Chemical Processing has bestowed Vaaler Awards on products and services that have dramatically improved the operations and economics of plants in the chemical industry. The awards are named after John C. Vaaler, editor in chief of Chemical Processing from 1946 to 1961 and chairman of the magazine’s Editorial Board until his death in 1963.

To be considered for the award, a product or service must have been commercialized in the United States between May 2005 and June 2007. This year, we received 33 entries.

Chemical Processing’s Editorial Board, which consists of technical professionals with diverse responsibilities and from a variety of industry sectors (see sidebar), judged the entries. This impartial panel evaluated all nominees for technological significance, novelty or uniqueness, and breadth of application. It wasn’t obliged to bestow any awards but did pick three winners:

  • Control Station for Loop-Pro Product Suite;
  • Emerson Process Management Rosemount Measurement Division for Smart Wireless; and
  • Pepperl+Fuchs for CorrTran MV Corrosion Detection Transmitters.
    Details on the developments appear on the following pages.

The judges

  • Vic Edwards, senior director of process safety Aker Kvaerner, Houston
  • Tim Frank, research scientist and senior technical leader, Dow Chemical, Midland, Mich.
  • Ben Paterson, engineering advisor, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Ind.
  • Roy Sanders, compliance team leader, PPG Industries, Lake Charles, La.
  • Ellen Turner, senior tech service representative, Eastman Chemical, Kingsport, Tenn.
  • Ben Weinstein, section head modeling & simulation, Procter & Gamble, West Chester, Ohio
  • Jon Worstell, senior staff chemist, Shell Chemical, Houston
  • Sheila Yang, senior process/specialty engineer, Fluor, South San Francisco

Transmitters put corrosion data into the loop

CorrTran MV Corrosion Detection Transmitters from Pepperl+Fuchs, Twinsburg, Ohio, allow plants to monitor both general and localized corrosion as well as conductance online in real time via a loop-powered 2-wire, 4–20-mA output with a multivariable HART signal (Figure 1). This enables sites to detect and address corrosion issues before they lead to costly problems and downtime, and to check the effectiveness of corrosion inhibitors.

Corrosion is a major problem at many chemical facilities. Conventional monitoring technology, such as the use of sacrificial coupons, is slow and reactive. Coupons must be installed and then, after a set period that may run weeks or even months, removed and evaluated. This can give an indication of general corrosion but often can’t provide insights or a timely warning about localized corrosion or pitting, which can quickly lead to leaks and other problems and which is said to be responsible for 70% to 90% of equipment and pipeline failures. Because of the traditional difficulty in tracking corrosion, many plants resort to expensive reactive maintenance.

With CorrTran MV, a plant now can monitor corrosion online and in real time using its standard control system and existing asset-management software and thus treat corrosion like traditional process variables such as temperature, pressure and pH. The data provide insights on general corrosion rate that make effective predictive maintenance possible as well as pinpoint pitting and enable correlation of the impact of changes in operating conditions on localized corrosion (Figure 2).

CorrTran MV employs three monitoring techniques — Linear Polarization Resistance (LPR), Harmonic Distortion Analysis (HDA) and Electrochemical Noise (ECN) — along with patented algorithms. LPR allows determination of the corrosion current and, through it, the general corrosion rate. HDA gives solution resistance, which is used to calculate a more-accurate corrosion rate. ECN assesses noise generated at the corroding metal/solution interface, to detect localized corrosion.

The standard probes consist of three electrodes, two for measurement and one for reference. The electrodes must be made of the same material as the hardware being monitored; a variety of metals, including carbon and stainless steels, high-nickel alloys, aluminum and titanium, are available.

CorrTran MV is the first field-mounted device to provide a corrosion rate via a multivariable 4–20-mA signal. The unit can handle both gas and liquid streams, including aqueous solutions containing as little as 1% water, and boasts a rugged design and proven industrial housing.

Despite its sophistication, a CorrTran MV Transmitter is simple to install and operate. It connects to any analog input port on a distributed control system or programmable logic controller and is easily configured via HART or PACTware. Data can be sent directly to asset-management software. Plus, because the device is HART-enabled, plant personnel can monitor critical data with a standard hand-held communicator. The units come in standard, nonincendive (for Division 2 hazardous locations) and intrinsically safe (for Division 1 locations) versions.

System simplifies the move to wireless

Smart Wireless from Emerson Process Management’s Rosemount Measurement Division, Chanhassen, Minn., makes it easy for plants to install and integrate wireless technology. Plus, it addresses the concerns over reliability, security, standards, system architecture, and availability of sensors and transmitters that have restricted the deployment of wireless.

Wireless technology has been used for decades for point-to-point telemetry applications and certainly is attracting growing interest nowadays. After all, wireless opens up the prospect of getting data impossible or uneconomic to get via traditional wired approaches. This goes beyond monitoring equipment currently not instrumented. It also promises to allow plants to take advantage of wired HART-based field devices’ embedded diagnostics now stranded because legacy control systems don’t support HART.

Wireless can lead to more extensive and effective predictive maintenance and better asset management, as well as enhanced speed of response to safety and environmental incidents.

Many plants are eager to try wireless. However, there’s been a sticking point — sites want to be sure that whatever wireless they put in will provide reliability and high performance and won’t become technologically obsolete. Smart Wireless offers that assurance.

Its wireless instruments communicate via a self-organizing field network based on the Time Synchronized Mesh Protocol (Figure 3); new devices connect automatically.

Installation doesn’t require elaborate site surveys or special tools. The network achieves greater than 99% reliability by automatically switching to clear nodes should a blockage occur, and is scalable to thousands of devices. The protocol employs channel hopping and has been shown to tolerate almost all types of interference and to be able to co-exist with other established wireless networks. The network can run as a stand-alone system, delivering significant value without the need for a plant-wide wireless infrastructure, or can be integrated within such an infrastructure.

Installation offers significant savings in engineering, materials and labor compared to wired systems — this can translate to a reduction in the cost per point of as much as 90%.

Smart Wireless also boasts robust security (validated by experts, including those at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security), greater-than-five-year battery life, and, importantly, a guaranteed upgrade path to the wireless standard under development.

Current products in the Smart Wireless portfolio consist of level, pressure, flow and temperature measurement units, on/off indication, and a gateway to transmit wireless data to the host; many more devices, including a HART upgrade module and a vibration monitor will be out shortly. A SmartPack starter kit (Figure 4) contains a wireless gateway and the customer’s choice of from five to 100 preconfigured wireless transmitters for pressure, level, temperature and flow that can be deployed right out of the box without additional user input or setup, as well as AMS Device Manager predictive maintenance software. It also comes with SmartStart Services, which include provision of a technician onsite for the first start-up, verification of device and gateway functionality, and a network health check to ensure optimal connectivity.

Software improves controller performance

Loop-Pro Product Suite Version 4.5 provides plants with an easy-to-use tool to check and enhance the performance of controllers. While the software incorporates highly sophisticated process modeling and tuning routines, it follows a simplified recipe-based procedure that suits it for use by operators and technicians.

Most plants heavily rely on proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control. Getting proper performance from such control loops plays a crucial role in achieving smooth, safe and efficient operation. This usually requires the efforts of control engineers or other specialists. However, such staff often are in short supply and have lots to do, hampering their ability to give adequate attention to many control loops. Other engineers on site generally can’t pick up part of the burden because they learned little about control theory in college. There is an untapped resource, though. Plants usually have far more operators than engineers — one estimate is that there’re 25 operators for every engineer at a typical petrochemical plant. But most operators typically only have a high-school education and so can’t use conventional control loop diagnostic and tuning tools.

The Loop-Pro Product Suite provides a simplified way to apply PID diagnostics and tuning best-practices. It enables operators to conduct thorough analyses of underperforming PID loops, compare potential changes to tuning parameters, and quickly and consistently optimize loops based on simulated PID controller performance and the associated process stability, while validating each step involved in the tuning. Moreover, tuning is tailored to the plant’s particular setup — operators customize the controller parameters based on the site’s distributed control system (DCS) or programmable logic controller (PLC) and unique control objective.

The recipe-based procedure involves 5 steps:

  1. Open a data file;
  2. Select and edit data;
  3. Choose a model;
  4. Fit the model to the data; and
  5. Specify a controller.

A lot of effort has been directed at making the software easy to use. For instance, just by moving a slide bar, an operator can alter the balance between controller robustness and speed of response, with the corresponding change in simulated performance visible in real time. Stability is represented graphically, easing interpretation of data and the handling of non-linearity and time-variant systems.

Color-coded alerts draw attention to potential stability issues. Descriptive statistics and robustness values are updated and displayed automatically.

The software provides a complete matrix of PID controller configurations, including P-only, PI, PID and PID with filter. An extensive library of pre-programmed DCS and PLC algorithms reduces the chance of miscalculation and eases the customizing of controller parameters.

Automated PID tuning reports simplify the documentation of analysis and recommendations, and can include user’s observations and other details.

About the Author

Mark Rosenzweig | Former Editor-in-Chief

Mark Rosenzweig is Chemical Processing's former editor-in-chief. Previously, he was editor-in-chief of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers' magazine Chemical Engineering Progress. Before that, he held a variety of roles, including European editor and managing editor, at Chemical Engineering. He has received a prestigious Neal award from American Business Media. He earned a degree in chemical engineering from The Cooper Union. His collection of typewriters now exceeds 100, and he has driven a 1964 Studebaker Gran Turismo Hawk for more than 40 years.