Letter To The Editor: Reader Uses 'Impolite Language' To Make Bhopal Point

Dear Sir:
You picked a great topic and started out - I am sure - with a good intention.  But somehow you managed to overlook a most inconvenient truth. 

Yes, you do point out that, "Companies still blunder into serious accidents because they don't remember previous incidents."  And that is most certainly true.  But, your gentle treatment of the chemical industry should have said clearly and up front that we, in this country, seem to have learned nothing from Bhopal - and stand a very good chance of doing something equally stupid with HF, MIC or some other toxin capable of wiping out an entire city with one release if we don't wake up soon.
Why do I use such impolite language?  Take a look at the articles detailing an "incident" at Bayer CropScience - involving nothing less that a tank full of MIC only 80 feet from a pressure vessel that exploded. [
Officials identify man killed in Bayer CropScience explosion  and CSB Investigators Report Bayer CropScience Explosion Was Caused by Runaway Chemical Reaction]  OK, only one worker was killed, and no MIC was released.  That should be little cause for celebration.  It should, instead, be a clarion call for meaningful reform of how such toxic chemicals are used, stored and disposed of - BEFORE we have another tragedy like Bhopal.  My language is impolite because unnecessary death is impolite - and no amount of "feel good" editorial or hand-wringing after the fact can mitigate this.
The chemical industry will be a lot better off if folks like you quit being so polite and start using your articles to demand meaningful reform before the politicians come up with impossible regulations that do not really get to the bottom of the safety debacle.  Do not expect industry executives to move toward anything useful in the safety arena.  These folks view safety as an operational expense to be minimized, not as a very important responsibility to be discharged with the same attention to detail that financial matters get.  Executives, as a group, just don't get safety.  Editors like you need to.
Thanks for listening.
Charles G. Scouten
Senior Associate
The Fusfeld Group, Inc.

Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.


  • <p>Dears, I am of the opinion that the person in question raising the issue probably got somewhat 'carried away in emotions' and this should have not taken place;since the incident took place much early-on and this must be born in mind.</p> <p>However the point is in many ways valid that we as chemical and process engineering folks employed in the industry are either "Compromising due process safety" or "showing lack of our competencies in identifying and mitigating the 'FORESEEABLE' high risk magnitude hazards" . This is becoming evident from recent accidents/fatalities&amp;catastrophe taking place in developed legendary world areas like USA(slightly higher) and Europe(slightly lesser)in last 7~9 years. We have to check and improve upon our attitude to be more deeply analytical in the first place and better vision on consequential credible events. Hope my requests are considered/responded positively by peers&amp; colleagues. </p> <p>Earnest regards Basically a weak human. QalanderChemFPE</p>


RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments