Environmental Health & Safety

New president will grapple with greenhouse gases

All the leading potential nominees favor “cap and trade”

By Mark Rosenzweig, Editor in Chief


Related articles

Exceed environmental expectations

Novel membranes promise pore performance

Chemical industry sees green

In honor of the ongoing presidential nominating process, I will remove my pocket protector, put away my slide rule and change from a mild-mannered magazine editor to a super-powerful political pundit: I predict that the next president of the United States will push for concerted action against greenhouse gas emissions.

Actually, that prediction doesn’t take much punditry prowess. Sen. Hillary Clinton, Mike Huckabee, Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama all support a cap-and-trade approach to controlling carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

Such an approach basically imposes a cap, likely at a lower level than current emissions. This amount of allowable pollution then is apportioned via individual permits that companies can trade. Backers say the approach provides flexibility as well as financial incentives because firms that reduce emissions can sell the permits they don’t need.

Any move towards cap and trade clearly will have a profound impact on chemical makers. The industry, which already has made impressive strides in paring pollution from plants, undoubtedly will have to ratchet up its efforts. The limits on greenhouse gas emissions also will provide business opportunities, a fact certainly not lost on some chemical companies.

For instance, in mid-February Dow Chemical, Midland, Mich., signed an agreement with Alstom Power, Levallois-Perret, France, to jointly develop and commercialize an advanced amine scrubbing system to remove CO2 from low-pressure flue gases from fossil-fuel-powered power plants and other installations.

This follows an August 2007 pact between BP Alternative Energy, London, and Powerspan Corp., Portsmouth, N. H., to collaboratively develop Powerspan’s “ECO2” ammonia-based CO2 capture technology for power stations. Construction of a pilot unit at a generating plant in Shadyside, Ohio, has begun and first results are expected this summer.

Better membrane technology also may improve CO2 removal from power-plant flue gas. For instance, polymer membranes with hour-glass-shaped pores being developed at the University of Texas at Austin promise high permeability with high selectivity. They also suit separation of CO2 from natural gas.

Significant efforts are occurring worldwide. For instance, Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates now is planning the world’s largest carbon capture and storage project. State-owned Abu Dhabi Future Energy Co. intends to invest as much as $4 billion to retrieve up to 15 million metric tons of CO2 each year from eight plants. The gas then would be injected underground to enhance oil recovery.

Long-term storage or sequestration of the CO2 is a major issue in its own right. In the U.S. injection into oil reservoirs may provide an attractive option to deal with some of the CO2. However, such reservoirs won’t make sense for much of the massive volume of CO2 that would be captured each year. Other options include use of salt domes and depleted coal seams.

Geologic sequestration poses all sorts of challenges — and risks — because of Mother Nature. Release of CO2 from a layer at the bottom of a lake in the African nation of Cameroon, caused perhaps by a landslide, led to the death of 1,700 people by asphyxiation, as Seán Ottewell relates (p. TK).

So, successfully grappling with greenhouse gases demands far more than political will.

Free Subscriptions

Chemical Processing Digital Edition

Access the entire print issue on-line and be notified each month via e-mail when your new issue is ready for you. Subscribe Today.

chemicalprocessing.com E-Newsletters

Stay ahead of the curve with free e-newsletters and alerts. They are delivered to your inbox on a regular basis and you may unsubscribe at any time. Subscribe Today.