Why Protective Coatings Damage Metal Artifacts — and How to Fix It

Using new 3D fluorescence imaging, scientists have identified how aging polymer coatings generate corrosive compounds, leading to improved preservation strategies for cultural artifacts.
July 7, 2025
4 min read

The chemical industry has played a crucial role in artifact preservation for the best part of a century.

It really started in the 1920s with the advent of ketone resins made from reactions involving methylcyclohexanone and/or cyclohexanone. Within a decade BASF and Howards of Ilford, which ceased operations in 1975, were producing several hundred tons a year of the chemicals, mostly destined for the textiles and coatings industries. 

These coatings had several benefits for conservators including ease of application and attractive optical properties, according to an article in the American Institute for Conservation’s Western Association for Art Conservation

In fact, by the 1950s, ketone resins were being recommended as a replacement for the natural dammar resin that had been used as a picture varnish since 1826.

Unfortunately, it soon became clear that the early ketone resins had a problem: They degraded over time, leading to yellowing.

The article goes on to describe different formulations of the ketone resins created by BASF, Howards and other companies over the next 50 years to solve the yellowing problem and formulate better products for the art conservation market, many of which are still in use. 

Metal Caveat

However, new findings described by the researchers as “significant and alarming” have cast doubt on the efficacy of polymer coatings, including acrylic resins, when used to preserve metal artifacts.

Such coatings protect from long-term exposure to light, heat, oxygen and humidity. They are in many ways ideal for this application, being lightweight, transparent and watertight. Plus, they can adhere strongly to the materials they are preserving, including waterlogged wood.

However, researchers at the University of Chemical Technology in Beijing, China, found that aging resin coatings can damage iron-containing metal artifacts by promoting rust formation on them rather than protecting them from it.

The challenge for the researchers was to find out exactly what was happening at the contact point between coating and artifact. 

Describing the work in an ACS Central Science article, they explain that current options available for analyzing chemical actions in this thin space rely on peeling away or dissolving the polymer, which could damage the artifact, or imaging techniques that are non-destructive and fast but not of high enough resolution to dig down into the chemistry involved.

So, they developed an in-house 3D fluorescence imaging technique. This showed that polymer aging occurred simultaneously at the surface of the polymer and at its interface with metal artifacts, generating carboxyl groups and hydroxyl radicals. These induce the corrosion and oxidation of metallic artifacts. The new technique works by identifying the presence of carboxyl groups.

They also found that metallic ions generated during this process could further aggravate the aging of polymer coatings.

Old-World Application

In a proof-of-concept demonstration, the researchers tested their new technique on a rusty iron coin from the Northern Song Dynasty (960–1127). 

They coated the artifact with acrylic resin B72, an ethyl methacrylate (70%) and methyl acrylate (30%) copolymer, which is the most widely used polymer with metal artifacts and expedited the polymer’s aging process with heat and light. 

The aged polymer coating magnified the production of damaging carboxyl groups, making the already-rusty artifact rustier (Figure 1). However, on a new piece of iron, the aged polymer coating did not speed up surface rusting. 

“It is surprising to acknowledge that the aged polymers can generate hazardous carboxyl groups and reactive hydroxyl radicals, inducing the oxidation and corrosion of the metal artifacts,” the researchers note in the article.

They go on to put forward some suggestions to improve the situation:

  • The storage environment of artifacts should be strictly controlled, in both the presence or absence of polymer coatings. 
  • Improved research into the structural design and preparation of protective polymers should be carried out prevent them developing defects such as pores. 
  • The use of specific stabilizers or anti-aging additives in polymer coatings is crucial.  

“These actions would promote the protective ability of polymer coatings and reduce the secondary damage to cultural artifacts,” the researchers concluded. “We will keep up the corresponding research on the preservation of cultural artifacts, and it is anticipated that the proposed strategy and findings could provide sufficient information for artifact conservation.”

About the Author

Seán Ottewell

Editor-at-Large

Seán Ottewell is a freelance editor based in Ireland. He has an impressive background in the chemical industry. After earning his degree in biochemistry at Warwick University, UK, he earned his master's in radiation biochemistry from the University of London. His first job out of school was with the UK Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London, where he served as scientific officer with the food science radiation unit.

From there he entered the world of publishing. In 1990, he was the assistant editor of The Chemical Engineer, later moving on to the chief editor's position. Since 1998, he has been a regular contributor to European Process Engineer, European Chemical Engineer, International Oil & Gas Engineer, European Food Scientist, EuroLAB, International Power Engineer, published by Setform Limited, London, UK.

Chemical Processing has been proud to call Ottewell Editor at Large since 2007.

He and his family run a holiday cottage in the small village of Bracklagh in East Mayo. He also fancies himself an alpaca farmer.

Sign up for our eNewsletters
Get the latest news and updates