1660240581197 Rosenzweigweb

Business Efforts Bolster Climate Accord

July 11, 2016
New report explores impact of corporate greenhouse-gas-reduction initiatives

The signing of the Paris Agreement by 174 nations on Earth Day this year was a momentous step in tackling climate change. Of course, we’ll have to see how individual governments translate intentions into actions. Fortunately, companies aren’t waiting to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

[pullquote]

Indeed, businesses worldwide will reduce their greenhouse-gas emissions substantially by 2030, predicts a first-ever report, “The Business End of Climate Change,” issued in late June by CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project), London, and We Mean Business, Washington, D.C., which is a consortium of organizations. The study estimates that businesses taking part in five current initiatives will cut their emissions by 3.2–4.2 billion metric tons of CO2 equivalent/yr (mtCO2e/yr) by then. However, these initiatives potentially could lead to much larger reductions — as great as 10 billion mtCO2e/yr by 2030, states the report.

The five initiatives — and the specific commitments to limit climate change made by participating companies — are:
• Science-Based Targets — setting emissions-reduction targets based on keeping temperature change below 2°C;
• EP100 — over 25 years doubling economic output from each unit of energy;
• RE100 — using 100% renewable electricity;
• Zero Deforestation — employing no commodities that cause deforestation; and
• Low Carbon Technology Partnership — developing and adopting low carbon technology in their industry. (The various sectors involved include the chemical industry.)

[javascriptSnippet ]

At the moment, about 300 companies have joined one or more of these initiatives, notes the report. By 2030, the roster could grow to around 4,500 firms, it adds.

The report’s estimate (developed by the NewClimate Institute, Cologne and Berlin, Germany) of a 3.2–4.2-billion mtCO2e/yr reduction is based on each initiative meeting its most ambitious goal for signing up members; the figure takes into account potential overlaps in savings among initiatives. The 10-billion mtCO2e/yr decrease comes from considering the impact if all relevant companies that could join an initiative did so.

A10-billion mtCO2e/yr reduction would serve as a significant step to keep emissions below the 42-billion mtCO2e/yr limit for 2030 to hold global warming below 2°C, states the report. “But that can only happen if governments create the right policy environment. That means acting as a catalyst and also removing barriers that currently stop companies from fighting climate change,” it warns. “Companies may be highly motivated to take action on climate change but run into obstacles. For example, they could find regulation prevents them from shifting to a lower-emissions supply chain or infrastructure,” it explains.

So, the report calls upon governments to:

• encourage utilities to offer renewable energy contracts and facilitate businesses adopting them;
• help companies build their own renewable electricity installations;
• support research and development on low carbon technologies;
• make energy-efficiency investments more attractive by offering grants and capital depreciation;
• create incentives for buyers and sellers of sustainable products; and
• reduce the administrative and cost burden of certification for producers, so they more easily can produce commodities without deforestation.

Read the complete report.

CDP and We Mean Business plan to issue the report annually. They hope to include additional initiatives in the future, and are looking for suggestions about ones to consider.

Knowing the potential impact of various initiatives certainly seems a sensible step to understanding the role business can play in curbing greenhouse-gas emissions.

MARK ROSENZWEIG is Chemical Processing's Editor in Chief. You can email him at [email protected].
About the Author

Mark Rosenzweig | Former Editor-in-Chief

Mark Rosenzweig is Chemical Processing's former editor-in-chief. Previously, he was editor-in-chief of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers' magazine Chemical Engineering Progress. Before that, he held a variety of roles, including European editor and managing editor, at Chemical Engineering. He has received a prestigious Neal award from American Business Media. He earned a degree in chemical engineering from The Cooper Union. His collection of typewriters now exceeds 100, and he has driven a 1964 Studebaker Gran Turismo Hawk for more than 40 years.

Sponsored Recommendations

Keys to Improving Safety in Chemical Processes (PDF)

Many facilities handle dangerous processes and products on a daily basis. Keeping everything under control demands well-trained people working with the best equipment.

Comprehensive Compressed Air Assessments: The 5-Step Process

A comprehensive compressed air audit will identify energy savings in an air system. This paper defines the 5 steps necessary for an effective air audit.

Get Hands-On Training in Emerson's Interactive Plant Environment

Enhance the training experience and increase retention by training hands-on in Emerson's Interactive Plant Environment. Build skills here so you have them where and when it matters...

Managing and Reducing Methane Emission in Upstream Oil & Gas

Measurement Instrumentation for reducing emissions, improving efficiency and ensuring safety.