Print page

Home » Articles » Process Puzzler

Perspective: Process Puzzler

Process Puzzler: Keep Incineration Safe

Readers suggest how to deal with a cyanide-containing fuel.


THIS MONTH'S PUZZLER
We're trying to establish the start-up procedure for burners in a natural draught incinerator. As always, there's the danger that a burner may not light in time to avoid tripping the infrared flame sensors. The standard practice after a trip is to purge any fuel present according to NFPA requirements. This would be easy if we used natural gas -- but this incinerator is in China and uses coke oven gas that contains hydrogen cyanide. How can we modify the purge procedure for this fuel? Do we need to change the burner design and other incinerator components to handle it?

DIVERT GAS DURING PURGING
I assume that the coke gas is the only source of fuel if I am reading your question correctly. If that is the case then it must be diverted during the purge cycle so that all combustibles can be removed from the furnace before introducing flame. The destination for the HCN gas can be a flare or it even can be vented to a stack if the time is short and environmental permits allow.

The burner design will probably need to be modified to handle this gas and provide stable operation. Most any burner vendor should be able to do this if you have a list of the gas components.

As an aside, you might consider providing an alternative source of fuel (propane, natural gas, etc.) for your pilot flame. That will allow you to decouple your incinerator operation from your coke furnace so that you can have the incinerator pilots lit and ready to go to "main flame" as you bring up your coke oven. This will reduce your coke gas diversion time to a minimum.
P. Hunter Vegas, senior project engineer
Avid Solutions, Winston-Salem, N.C.


SWITCH GASES
Why not use natural gas to light-off or use for the ignition and then switch to coke gas as your main fuel after the light-off?
Randy Cook, maintenance engineer/energy analyst
Yates Services, Smyrna, Tenn.


CHECK COMBUSTION CONDITIONS
Because purging is necessary, it may be better to light the burners with natural gas and then verify that the incinerator temperature will permit destruction of hydrogen cyanide. Its autoignition temperature (AIT) is 1,000 degrees F, well below the adiabatic flame temperature of natural gas at 10% excess air, which is about 3,500 degrees F. (AIT is used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to rank chemicals for thermal disposal. The EPA classifies hydrogen cyanide with toluene as Class II.) According to David Lewandowski's book, "Design of Thermal Oxidation Systems for Volatile Organic Compounds" (Table 3.2,. p. 27), a temperature of 400°F above AIT is required with a residence time of at least 0.5 sec. This is for a 98% destruction set by Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards. There is probably sufficient time and temperature to assure combustion of the cyanide but a burner specialist should confirm this. A cold spot in the incinerator could cause poor combustion. The table cited assumes good mixing and at least 3% oxygen. Injecting pure oxygen would raise the flame temperature and may improve combustion; this works in Claus burners familiar to refineries.

If natural gas or another gaseous fuel is not available, there are alternatives: A dual-service burner may permit operation with a light fuel oil. Or, it might be possible to strip the hydrogen cyanide from the fuel gas in a two-step pH-controlled process with an aqueous hydroxide. Perhaps enough gas could be purified and compressed to set aside for start-ups and shutdowns.

One sure-fire approach would be to divert the exhaust through an operating catalytic thermal oxidizer until a sufficient temperature is attained.

Fortunately, this construction is going on in China and not the U.S., where standards are far stricter.
Dirk Willard, senior process engineer
International Steel Services, Inc., New Caledonia


APRIL'S PUZZLER
We blend a partially dehydrated color paste with mineral turpentine (C9–C16 range) at a volume ratio of 15:85. The final flow is 25 gal/min. We then disperse solids, up to 20% by weight, in the solvent. The solids form clumps. The paste isn't shear sensitive. The mixture is chilled to reduce vaporization. As a result, solvent viscosity is somewhere between glue and milk after chilling. The final product is an oil-based paint that is heated before use in a sprayer. Turpentine is driven off and recycled. One engineer has proposed blending this mixture in one shot with a single hydrofoil impeller in a tank with a 1.5:1 length-to-diameter (L/D) ratio. We have baffled closed tanks available in the mix room with L/D ratios of 1:1,1.5:1, 2:1, 2:1 and 3:1 and volumes of 340 gal., 220 gal., 500 gal., 500 gal., 650 gal., respectively. Can you suggest a better way of mixing the products? How can we improve this process to make it safer, easier to operate and more environmentally friendly?

Send us your comments, suggestions or solutions for this question by March 12, 2010. We'll include as many of them as possible in the April 2010 issue and all on ChemicalProcessing.com. Send visuals — a sketch is fine. E-mail us at ProcessPuzzler@putman.net or mail to Process Puzzler, Chemical Processing, 555 W. Pierce Road, Suite 301, Itasca, IL 60143. Fax: (630) 467-1120. Please include your name, title, location and company affiliation in the response.

And, of course, if you have a process problem you'd like to pose to our readers, send it along and we'll be pleased to consider it for publication.

More From This Perspective

Process Puzzler: Keep Incineration Safe
01/25/2010
Readers suggest how to deal with a cyanide-containing fuel.

Process Puzzler: Combat Column Contamination
12/15/2009
Readers suggest how to tackle a troublesome tower.

Process Puzzler: Guard Against Gas
11/10/2009
Readers suggest the source of a safety stumper.

Process Puzzler: Tell the Bosses the Truth
10/15/2009
Management’s goal for a material balance likely isn’t feasible.

Process Puzzler: Fix a Fluid Flow Flaw
09/15/2009
Readers suggest solutions for dryer difficulties.

Process Puzzler: Master a Musty Mess
08/13/2009
Readers suggest how to deal with a contamination source.

Tame a Troublesome Thermowell
07/23/2009
Readers suggest solutions for a fluid-bed corrosion issue.

Process Puzzler: Avoid Another Fatal Accident
06/19/2009
Readers consider the causes of a deadly fire.

Process Puzzler: Eliminate Evaporator Effect
05/21/2009
Readers solve an evaporation pump problem.

Process Puzzler: Kayo a Cascade Control Complication
04/24/2009
Readers suggest how to properly regulate an exothermic reaction.

Clear Up a Compressor Conundrum
03/23/2009
Readers decipher a compressor surge.

Process Puzzler: Sidestep a Scale-up Scare
03/04/2009
Readers grapple with a reactor production change.

February Process Puzzler: Isolate Electrical Incidents
02/03/2009
Readers unravel a wiring riddle.

Process Puzzler: Soothe a Skittish Supervisor
12/16/2008
Readers weigh the wisdom of cladding exchanger tubes to answer last month's Process Puzzler.

Get out of the Soup
12/02/2008
Readers clarify a consistency complication.

Quell a Quality Control Confrontation
10/27/2008
Readers recommend improvements for a pH control process

October Process Puzzler: Foil a Future Fire
10/13/2008
Readers suggest ways to improve safety at a cylinder storage site. Also, December's Process Puzzler: Improving coagulant consistency.

September Process Puzzler: Fix a Fast Fouling Filter
09/05/2008
Readers suggest ways to improve operation and safety. Also included is November's Process Puzzler Question.

October's Puzzler: Change Layout and Operating Procedures to Reduce Risk
08/13/2008

September 2008 Process Puzzler: Kayo a Drum Problem
08/13/2008
Readers suggest ways to improve the performance of a pot

Process Puzzler Question: Lengthen media life and reduce operating costs in a pressure filter
06/16/2008
Our pressure filter suffers from excessive cake build-up. Although some caking is necessary for efficient filtering, it would be desirable to extend the running time. What do you suggest? Also, do you have any ideas on how we can lengthen media life or reduce operating costs?

Process Puzzler: Deal with dryer drizzle
06/16/2008
Readers suggest ways to solve a spray interference problem

August 2008: Designing a desulfurization process
06/01/2008
How would you improve this design?

November Process Puzzler: Deter dryer difficulties
10/30/2007
Readers suggest how to improve reliability and avoid danger, in this month's Process Puzzler.

October Process Puzzler: Keep a float from sinking operation
09/27/2007
Readers suggest how to achieve reliable level measurement, in this month's Process Puzzler.

September Process Puzzler: Will steam get a plant into hot water?
08/31/2007
Readers offer advice about switching a clean-in-place procedure.

August Process Puzzler: Remove operating problems not just an impurity
08/01/2007
Readers suggest how to keep sludge from clogging equipment in this month's Process Puzzler.

July Process Puzzler: Blow away conveying system problems
07/06/2007
Readers suggest how to improve the reliability of a crucial blower in this month's Process Puzzler.

June Process Puzzler: Forestall furnace foibles
05/16/2007
Readers suggest how to address a hard-running vaporizer in this month's Process Puzzler.

May Process Puzzler: Quick fix needed!
04/24/2007
Readers recommend solutions for a pump control problem in this month's Chemical Processing Process Puzzler.

April Process Puzzler: What do we tell maintenance?
03/29/2007
Readers identify problems with a relief system in April's Process Puzzler.

March Process Puzzler: Does removal approach offer a quicksilver lining?
03/01/2007
Readers consider ways to clean mercury from scrubber blowdown in this month's Process Puzzler.

February's Process Puzzler: Improve a grandfathered unloading station
01/30/2007
Readers suggest ways to improve a grandfathered unloading station in this month's Process Puzzler.

January Process Puzzler: Sticky valve
01/03/2007
Readers offer ideas for the cause of a sticky valve in Chemical Processing's monthly Process Puzzler feature.

December Process Puzzler: Debug a weigh feeder
11/29/2006
Readers offer ideas for improving reliability of a weigh feeder in Chemical Processing's monthly Process Puzzler feature.

November Process Puzzler: Consider options for automation
10/31/2006
Readers suggest ways to automate an HCl absorber in this month's Process Puzzler in Chemical Processing.

October Process Puzzler: Improve centrifuge separation capacity, quality
09/29/2006
Readers offer suggestions to improve centrifuge separation capacity and quality in Chemical Processing's monthly Process Puzzler feature.

September Process Puzzler: Uncovering cause of solid build-up
09/14/2006
Readers offer suggestions to improve reliability of a vibrating screen in Chemical Processing's monthly Process Puzzler feature.

August Process Puzzler: Avoiding a future accident
08/22/2006
Readers suggest possible causes for a mysterious mixer explosion in Chemical Processing's monthly Process Puzzler feature.

July Process Puzzler: Prevent the burn-out of a mixer
06/28/2006
Readers suggest quick solutions to a solid-liquid mixing problem in Chemical Processing's monthly Process Puzzler feature.

May Process Puzzler: Boost the reliability of a solvent supply pump
05/25/2006
Readers suggest solutions to cavitation in this month's Process Puzzler.

April 2006 Process Puzzler: Fixing a Fouled Flue Gas System
03/11/2006
Readers identify the cause of poor absorption in flue gas system in this month's process puzzler.

Making sense of temperature sensing
01/06/2006
Readers provide solutions to a thermowell problem in this month's Process Puzzler.

Condensate cripples compressor
01/05/2006
Readers offer tips on how to keep a standby compressor ready for service.

Know when the end is near
01/02/2006
Chemical Processing's readers offer tips about how to determine resin-reaction end point.

Don’t waste your boilers
01/02/2006
Chemical Processing's readers offer tips about how to properly isolate a waste heat boiler.

Track that spill
01/02/2006
Chemical Processing's readers offer tips about how to locate and identify a chemical spill.

Prevent heat-exchanger plugging
12/30/2005
Readers suggest how to keep a solvent recovery system running smoothly.

Cure column hiccups
12/29/2005

Process Puzzler: Choose a pump wisely
05/25/2005
Readers offer tips about how to choose the best pump for slurry service.

Process Manufacturing Puzzler: Stop solvent losses
04/01/2005
A reader is sufferring significant solvent losses during his batch process. Read about how his peers might solve his problem.

Process Puzzler: Keep cables in their place
02/21/2005
A Chemical Processing reader was looking for a solution to a cable hanger problem. At his plant, a 200-lb. cable bundle supported by cable hangers fell and injured one man. Read what advice our readers had for him and take a look at next months' question.

Process Puzzler: Serve up better column operation
12/21/2004
Readers tackle Chemical Processing's process puzzler question and offer tips about how to keep a stripper column from flooding.

Solutions Centers

The Optimized Plant

The Optimized Plant

Sponsored by Honeywell

Honeywell can help sustain the life of your assets and maximize the operational performance of your plant or mill.

Solutions for the Chemicals Industry

Solutions for the Chemicals Industry

Sponsored by SAP

Measure your performance against your peers and discover which functional areas you can improve. Includes manufacturing, supply chain, R&D, regulatory compliance (ie REACH), and customer management.

Business Performance

Business Performance

Sponsored by Honeywell

Improve performance and increase profitability with integrated, comprehensive solutions that protect your people, process and assets, while reducing costs and improving productivity.

Marketplace (Sponsored)