Perspectives: Process Puzzler

Process Puzzler: Serve up better column operation

Readers tackle Chemical Processing's process puzzler question and offer tips about how to keep a stripper column from flooding.

 

 QUESTION FROM OCTOBER'S CHEMICAL PROCESSING

 We use a light stripping column for removing methane and lighter components from natural gas liquids (NGL). We are having flooding problems with the column that we think might be due to water (the feed is saturated). Simulation shows all the water should go overhead and no hydrates should form. The first tower has a condenser temperature of -20°C (-4°F), a bottoms temperature of 84°C (183°F) and an operating pressure of 20 bar (295 psig). Could our simulation be wrong? What else could be going on?

Check the bypass valve

It appears that the hot-vapor bypass valve at the reflux drum is leaking, increasing the amount of condensate in the condenser. This reduces the heat-transfer surface area and the rate of condensation, which will cause the tower pressure to rise (295 psig). This increased tower pressure will result in decreased pressure drop and vapor velocity across the trays. The liquid on the trays then &ldquoleaks&rdquo backward through the sieves and onto the lower trays; hence, your column appears to be flooding.

Likewise, at 183°F no water is carried over. But if it is, it&rsquos freezing in the condenser (-4°F) and restricting vapor flow. This will cause the same effects as mentioned above: increased tower pressure.
Ron Johnson, process engineer
Alpharma Pharmaceuticals, Baltimore

Keep ice at bay
My guess is that ice is forming on the trays at the top of the stripper. This will restrict vapor flow and liquid flow in the downcomers, leading to a combination of jet and liquid flooding.
Don Pearson, technical team leader, derivatives
PPG Industries, Lake Charles, La.

 

Pack your column
What type of internals do you have: packing or plates? What is the design liquid-to-gas ratio? What is the design liquid flow? Are you cooling at the top portion of the tower?
Without knowing these answers, my best guess is that you need packing with 95-98% free void space to reduce or eliminate flooding.
Tom Murphy, P.E.

Remove the water
Your problem is most likely due to vapor or liquid flow restrictions arising from accumulation of frost and/or ice formation in the column since the reflux temperature is below the ice point (32°F/0° C).

The solution to the problem would be the elimination of water from the unit. Since this is an existing column, the best way to remove the water will depend on the type of column construction and the product requirements.

1. You could raise the condenser temperature above the freezing point. This would allow moisture to leave the unit with the overhead vapors. Unfortunately, the higher temperature would also increase the carryover of NGL components, which could reduce yield. The amount of moisture in the overhead vapor will also be limited by the partial pressure of water. So, unless there is a high fraction of light components to carry away the moisture, liquid water might accumulate in the column and create other problems.

2. You could remove any moisture directly from the column feed. This would necessarily involve another operation.

3. If a trayed column is employed, you could process a side draw from a downcomer. The liquid sidedraw can be sent to a coalescer and decanter to allow phase separation and accumulation of a water phase that can simply be drawn away. The overhead hydrocarbon-rich phase would be returned to the column.
Dr. Donald J. Stookey, director, industrial technology
Compact Membrane Systems Inc., Wilmington, Del.

Raise the temperatures
1. You probably have hydrates in the condenser, even if the simulation doesn&rsquot indicate their presence. Most hydrocarbon gas streams will form hydrates at temperatures below 50°F or 60°F. At your operating temperatures, you should dry the feed upstream of the column or raise the condensing temperature to 60°F or 80°F.

2. The feed is saturated with water: How are you taking it out of the column? The overheads are too cold and bottoms are too hot. You need a water draw-off tray. Otherwise the water will build up on the trays (especially if they have weirs or, worse yet, sumps) and cause flooding.
Larry Tarkington, P.E.
Project Engineering of Texas, San Antonio

Add more trays
You should consider increasing the number of bubble trays and also adjust the velocity of the feed. It appears that there is not enough entrainment of water droplets, whereby in a saturated atmosphere the water droplets flood the stream. The residence time for water vapor to condense and drop out may not be sufficient.

Another option would be to inject diethylene glycol into the feed stream prior to introducing feed in the stripping column.
Uruj Kirmani, consultant

Add some heat
I suspect ice is building up in the column on any tray below 0°C. This is the result of mixing the -20°C reflux and the overhead vapor. Although the composition of the feed and bottoms is not given, NGL saturated with water will probably hold more water than can be held by the small quantity of overhead liquid methane in contact with ice at -20°C.
David A. Milligan, P.E., C.C.E., principal engineer
Matches, Edmond, Okla.

 

 FEBRUARY&rsquoS PUZZLER

We recently had a spill at our chemical plant during the night. The night-shift supervisor didn&rsquot write it up, so we weren&rsquot sure of the exact location. Since our plant is in the Southeast, the soil is sandy and we were worried about the spill contaminating any water wells in the area.

 Is there an easy way to locate, track and identify a chemical spill? Is some sort of equipment available that can do this?

Send us your comments, suggestions or solutions for this question by Feb. 5. We&rsquoll include as many of them as possible in the February 2005 issue. Send visuals, too &mdash a sketch is fine. E-mail us at ProcessPuzzler@putman.net or mail to ProcessPuzzler, Chemical Processing, 555 W. Pierce Rd., Suite 301, Itasca, IL 60143. Fax: (630) 467-1120. Please include your name, title, location and company affiliation in the response.

And, of course, if you have a process problem you&rsquod like to pose to our readers, send it along and we&rsquoll be pleased to consider it for publication.


 


 

More from this perspective...

Title

February's Process Puzzler: Improve a grandfathered unloading station

Readers suggest ways to improve a grandfathered unloading station in this month's Process Puzzler.

01/30/2007

March Process Puzzler: Does removal approach offer a quicksilver lining?

Readers consider ways to clean mercury from scrubber blowdown in this month's Process Puzzler.

03/01/2007

April Process Puzzler: What do we tell maintenance?

Readers identify problems with a relief system in April's Process Puzzler.

03/29/2007

May Process Puzzler: Quick fix needed!

Readers recommend solutions for a pump control problem in this month's Chemical Processing Process Puzzler.

04/24/2007

June Process Puzzler: Forestall furnace foibles

Readers suggest how to address a hard-running vaporizer in this month's Process Puzzler.

05/16/2007

July Process Puzzler: Blow away conveying system problems

Readers suggest how to improve the reliability of a crucial blower in this month's Process Puzzler.

07/06/2007

August Process Puzzler: Remove operating problems not just an impurity

Readers suggest how to keep sludge from clogging equipment in this month's Process Puzzler.

08/01/2007

September Process Puzzler: Will steam get a plant into hot water?

Readers offer advice about switching a clean-in-place procedure.

08/31/2007

October Process Puzzler: Keep a float from sinking operation

Readers suggest how to achieve reliable level measurement, in this month's Process Puzzler.

09/27/2007

November Process Puzzler: Deter dryer difficulties

Readers suggest how to improve reliability and avoid danger, in this month's Process Puzzler.

10/30/2007

August 2008: Designing a desulfurization process

How would you improve this design?

06/01/2008

Process Puzzler Question: Lengthen media life and reduce operating costs in a pressure filter

Our pressure filter suffers from excessive cake build-up. Although some caking is necessary for efficient filtering, it would be desirable to extend the running time. What do you suggest? Also, do you have any ideas on how we can lengthen media life or reduce operating costs?

06/16/2008

Process Puzzler: Deal with dryer drizzle

Readers suggest ways to solve a spray interference problem

06/16/2008

October's Puzzler: Change Layout and Operating Procedures to Reduce Risk

08/13/2008

September 2008 Process Puzzler: Kayo a Drum Problem

Readers suggest ways to improve the performance of a pot

08/13/2008

September Process Puzzler: Fix a Fast Fouling Filter

Readers suggest ways to improve operation and safety. Also included is November's Process Puzzler Question.

09/05/2008

October Process Puzzler: Foil a Future Fire

Readers suggest ways to improve safety at a cylinder storage site. Also, December's Process Puzzler: Improving coagulant consistency.

10/13/2008

Quell a Quality Control Confrontation

Readers recommend improvements for a pH control process

10/27/2008

Get out of the Soup

Readers clarify a consistency complication.

12/02/2008

Process Puzzler: Soothe a Skittish Supervisor

Readers weigh the wisdom of cladding exchanger tubes to answer last month's Process Puzzler.

12/16/2008