Perspectives: Plant InSites

Assess the Gravity of the Situation

Flow systems without pumps demand particular attention.

Due to pumps we tend to get careless in considering flow systems. A few inches of fluid pressure drop aren’t very important when we shed multiple psi across a control valve. In contrast, without a pump, small pressure drops count. As a result, gravity-flow, free-surface and open-channel systems cause a disproportionately high number of flow problems at plants.

Gravity-flow systems get their driving force from static head of liquid. Free-surface flow includes piping systems where flow rate (usually generated by gravity) doesn’t completely fill a pipe or duct. Open-channel systems are similar except that the flow channel isn’t fully closed.

Let’s examine two common cases that often go together: free draining from a vessel and free surface flow in a pipe.

Many vessels have had problems with free-draining connections. Once a nozzle unseals, vapor can enter with the liquid flow. To prevent vapor locking the draw line, liquid velocity must be low enough to allow vapor to vent back into the vessel. Free-surface flow into a nozzle can be very complex. Flow behavior depends upon density difference between vapor and liquid, flow patterns entering the nozzle, velocity of incoming liquid and many other factors. The only sure method to provide free-surface flow is to make the inlet nozzle big enough that some of the more unusual flow patterns don’t get established.

Achieving reliable free-surface flow requires evaluating the flowing liquid’s Froude number. In general this dimensionless number is the ratio of gravity to inertial forces. Gravity (or applied) forces represent energy driving flow while inertial forces (opposing forces) represent resistance to flow.

Fr = V/c (1) where Fr is the Froude number, V is the characteristic velocity of the system, and c is a characteristic wave-propagation velocity. Unfortunately, the exact form V and c take in a specific application depends upon circumstances.

Modifying the Froude number to a dimensionless superficial volumetric flux (J*) suitable for use with venting nozzles we get:

J* = 4Q/[πd2(gd)0.5] (2) where Q is volumetric rate of flow, d is actual inside diameter, not nominal pipe diameter, and g is the gravitational constant, all in consistent units.

Simpson identified a maximum upper value of 0.3 for the Froude number for reliable self-venting flow through a nozzle entering a vertical pipe [Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, 8th ed., p. 6-29 (2008)]. This means the outlet nozzle will run less than half full at the nozzle entrance and gives the design equations:

d = 4.27Q0.4 (3) for d in cm and Q in m3/hr, and d = 0.928Q0.4 (4) for d in in. and Q in gpm.

These equations allow us to find the minimum required diameter to reliably get a specific flow rate if the nozzle isn’t fully flooded.

The second common situation involves a partially full near-horizontal pipe. Flow requires pressure drop. In gravity-flow systems pressure drop comes from height of liquid. Partially full pipes must slope to provide height of liquid to drive fluid flow. The question is, how much? Many mechanical and chemical engineers use arbitrary standards. Few of them have heard of the Chezy formula for estimating fluid velocity in a sloped line:

v = (2g/f)0.5(dhs/4)0.5 (5) where v is fluid velocity, f is Fanning friction factor, dh is hydraulic diameter, and s is sine of the slope angle. (The first term is the Chezy coefficient, C.) At a constant slope, s equals the height difference divided by the length of pipe.

For sizes smaller than 6 in., pipe should run no more than 50% full to allow for vapor backflow; for pipes larger than 6 in., most applications can tolerate up to 75%-full pipes. For the relatively short lengths at process plants a 40:1 slope is a good starting point for evaluating piping systems with commercial pipe and low viscosity fluids (e.g., water and light hydrocarbons). If available, steeper slopes allow for smaller diameter pipes.

Use flooded-nozzle sizing to set initial intake size, establish flow with a gradual slope, then increase the slope and smoothly decrease pipe diameter to reduce investment. With large systems, long pipe runs and more complex layouts, some research to decide on hydraulic design will reward your efforts.


Andrew Sloley is Chemical Processing's Contributing Editor. You can e-mail him at ASloley@putman.net

 

More from this perspective...

Title

How Important is Piping Symmetry?

Designers should consider the impact of unequal flows in branches.

04/05/2010

Improve Your Plant's Prospects

Keep economics and the lifecycle stage of a facility in mind .

03/04/2010

Is Your Vessel Foundation Really Strong Enough?

Certain situations can lead to exceeding design limits.

12/03/2012

Is achieving design conditions realistic?

Many factors can influence how equipment should be operated.

08/29/2005

Keep Bundle Blunders at Bay

Combining air coolers can provide savings but also pose problems.

03/16/2009

Keep a steady eye on measurements

While engineers often strive to keep processes running without too much variation, measurements that don’t change may be a cause for concern not celebration, as one refinery can attest.

06/19/2006

Keep measurements on the level

Changes in liquid densities can throw off readings. Plants commonly rely on differential pressure (DP) cells to measure level. Read this month's Plant InSites for advice on how to solve these level problems.

04/17/2006

Keep others from making “classic” mistakes

A heat exchanger problem provides a textbook example of design limitations, according to Contributing Editor Andrew Sloley.

04/24/2007

Keep parallel pumps in line

Mind the curves when using different size pumps.

02/13/2008

Let the Buyer Beware

Understand common dangers when developing specifications and evaluating bids.

11/21/2011

Make jacketing your strong suit

Small details in jacketed-pipe configuration can have a big impact, according to Chemical Processing's Contributing Editor Andrew Sloley.

12/05/2006

Make sure you’ve got a good flange match

Standard large-diameter flanges don’t necessarily mate. Andrew Sloley provides insight in this month's Plant Insites column.

03/06/2007

More Exchanger Area Can Pose Pitfalls

This "obvious solution" for heat-transfer problems may not work.

02/01/2012

Nix Nozzle Nuisances

Avoid flow problems by considering the impact of inlet losses.

05/20/2009

Odd Layout May Make Even More Sense

Unusual tower configuration better copes with control valve failure.

01/23/2013

Old Doesn't Mean Outdated

Some equations have stood the test of time.

04/04/2012

Pick the Proper Centrifugal Pump

Consider the impact of startup conditions and prospective operating points.

07/11/2011

Piping Geometry: Grasp Line Layout

Draining, venting, fouling and other considerations affect piping geometry.

09/06/2012

Plant InSites: Cast a cold eye on columns

Subcooling can complicate and compromise tower performance

05/23/2008

Plant InSites: Come Up With a Solid Estimate

Use geometry to figure out the amount of material in storage or equipment.

12/14/2009