Perspectives: Plant InSites

Assess the Gravity of the Situation

Flow systems without pumps demand particular attention.

Due to pumps we tend to get careless in considering flow systems. A few inches of fluid pressure drop aren’t very important when we shed multiple psi across a control valve. In contrast, without a pump, small pressure drops count. As a result, gravity-flow, free-surface and open-channel systems cause a disproportionately high number of flow problems at plants.

Gravity-flow systems get their driving force from static head of liquid. Free-surface flow includes piping systems where flow rate (usually generated by gravity) doesn’t completely fill a pipe or duct. Open-channel systems are similar except that the flow channel isn’t fully closed.

Let’s examine two common cases that often go together: free draining from a vessel and free surface flow in a pipe.

Many vessels have had problems with free-draining connections. Once a nozzle unseals, vapor can enter with the liquid flow. To prevent vapor locking the draw line, liquid velocity must be low enough to allow vapor to vent back into the vessel. Free-surface flow into a nozzle can be very complex. Flow behavior depends upon density difference between vapor and liquid, flow patterns entering the nozzle, velocity of incoming liquid and many other factors. The only sure method to provide free-surface flow is to make the inlet nozzle big enough that some of the more unusual flow patterns don’t get established.

Achieving reliable free-surface flow requires evaluating the flowing liquid’s Froude number. In general this dimensionless number is the ratio of gravity to inertial forces. Gravity (or applied) forces represent energy driving flow while inertial forces (opposing forces) represent resistance to flow.

Fr = V/c (1) where Fr is the Froude number, V is the characteristic velocity of the system, and c is a characteristic wave-propagation velocity. Unfortunately, the exact form V and c take in a specific application depends upon circumstances.

Modifying the Froude number to a dimensionless superficial volumetric flux (J*) suitable for use with venting nozzles we get:

J* = 4Q/[πd2(gd)0.5] (2) where Q is volumetric rate of flow, d is actual inside diameter, not nominal pipe diameter, and g is the gravitational constant, all in consistent units.

Simpson identified a maximum upper value of 0.3 for the Froude number for reliable self-venting flow through a nozzle entering a vertical pipe [Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, 8th ed., p. 6-29 (2008)]. This means the outlet nozzle will run less than half full at the nozzle entrance and gives the design equations:

d = 4.27Q0.4 (3) for d in cm and Q in m3/hr, and d = 0.928Q0.4 (4) for d in in. and Q in gpm.

These equations allow us to find the minimum required diameter to reliably get a specific flow rate if the nozzle isn’t fully flooded.

The second common situation involves a partially full near-horizontal pipe. Flow requires pressure drop. In gravity-flow systems pressure drop comes from height of liquid. Partially full pipes must slope to provide height of liquid to drive fluid flow. The question is, how much? Many mechanical and chemical engineers use arbitrary standards. Few of them have heard of the Chezy formula for estimating fluid velocity in a sloped line:

v = (2g/f)0.5(dhs/4)0.5 (5) where v is fluid velocity, f is Fanning friction factor, dh is hydraulic diameter, and s is sine of the slope angle. (The first term is the Chezy coefficient, C.) At a constant slope, s equals the height difference divided by the length of pipe.

For sizes smaller than 6 in., pipe should run no more than 50% full to allow for vapor backflow; for pipes larger than 6 in., most applications can tolerate up to 75%-full pipes. For the relatively short lengths at process plants a 40:1 slope is a good starting point for evaluating piping systems with commercial pipe and low viscosity fluids (e.g., water and light hydrocarbons). If available, steeper slopes allow for smaller diameter pipes.

Use flooded-nozzle sizing to set initial intake size, establish flow with a gradual slope, then increase the slope and smoothly decrease pipe diameter to reduce investment. With large systems, long pipe runs and more complex layouts, some research to decide on hydraulic design will reward your efforts.


Andrew Sloley is Chemical Processing's Contributing Editor. You can e-mail him at ASloley@putman.net

 

More from this perspective...

Title

Do some heavy thinking about light loads

Cutting steam demand can get you into hot water, advises Contributing Editor Andrew W. Sloley, contributing editor, in this month's Plant InSites column.

10/01/2007

Don't Calculate Pressure Drops in a Vacuum

Consider flow regime boundaries and the limitations of methods.

06/08/2011

Don't Err With Air-Fin Exchangers

Take considerable care when specifying maximum air temperature.

10/04/2010

Don't Let Heater Control Get You Steamed

03/03/2004

Don't Let a Second Liquid Phase Faze You

07/16/2013

Don’t let parallel pumps cross you up

Small differences with parallel pumps can lead to big difficulties, according to Andrew Sloley in this month's Plant InSites column.

03/28/2007

Don’t look at precondensers in a vacuum

Consider the impact of the downstream vacuum ejector on precondenser performance, advises Andrew Sloley, in this month's Plant InSites column.

08/20/2007

Don’t stack the deck against yourself

Always consider future expansions before finalizing layouts

03/14/2008

Ease Measurement of Column Internal Flow

Opting for a pump instead of gravity to return liquid to a tower often makes sense

09/17/2014

Effectively Remove Droplets

Various factors affect the choice and operation of liquid/vapor separators.

03/19/2013

Find the Real Maximum Pressure Of Vessels

Always consider static head when assessing pressure vessels.

04/21/2011

Find the real cause of pump gas up

Simply blaming high feed temperature for inadequate suction isn’t enough when diagnosing pump problems. Read this article to get a laundry list of causes for pump gas up.

04/17/2006

Flow: Avoid Splitting Headaches

Ensuring proper control of parallel flow paths demands care.

09/12/2013

Full Vacuum Rating Isn't an Empty Benefit

It often can provide important but underappreciated advantages for vessels

10/16/2008

Get Valid Samples

Materials’ selection and piping design markedly can affect results.

06/25/2014

Get Your Head Around Velocity Head

Confusion about what the term means can spell trouble.

05/02/2012

Give gaskets a squeeze

Reevaluate gasket use when operating conditions or maintenance procedures change.

09/16/2004

Head Off Heat Exchanger Errors

Selecting the most-appropriate heads for a shell-and-tube unit is crucial.

12/16/2013

Heat Exchangers: Is Mist a Must?

Water sprays may boost performance of air-fin exchangers.

01/02/2013

Heat integration steps can present control problems

The more energy prices rise, the more heat integration saves. However, heat integration steps can present complex control problems. Slip-ups in putting control systems in place can make operations nearly impossible. That certainly was the case at one unit using heat recovery.

09/13/2006