Perspectives: From the Editor

Sustainability Sustains Momentum

Drivers for use of renewable materials differ markedly between producers and users

By MARK ROSENZWEIG, Editor in Chief

The quest to improve the sustainability of chemical manufacturing takes many forms. Indeed, our recent cover story “Sustainability Gets the Spotlight,” highlighted some novel approaches. Now, a new survey underscores that chemical makers and their customers continue to move toward more sustainable products. Among its key findings: 72% of manufacturers already offer more sustainable versions of chemicals or plan to do so within two years; 80% of their customers show the same or higher interest in sustainable chemicals compared to a year ago; and 75% of chemicals users have started to market products made with more sustainable chemicals or expect to within two years.

Commissioned by Genomatica, San Diego, a company that develops and licenses bio-based processes to produce chemicals, and conducted by ICIS, London, the survey, published in September, is the third such one since 2009. It drew 958 responses, the largest number ever — in fact, 30% more than the last survey, in 2012. Inputs came both from chemical manufacturers and their customers. More than half of the respondents (53%) held senior positions such as CEO, vice president or general manager. Europe accounted for 24% of respondents and North America 22%, compared to 40% and 27%, respectively, in the last survey. In contrast, a higher level of respondents came from South East Asia (17% versus 10% in 2012) and the Middle East (10% versus 5%).

The most common sustainability initiative is process improvement, e.g., reducing energy use or waste, which was cited by 71% of respondents. It was followed by initiatives for reducing or eliminating toxic chemicals (noted by 42%), using or boosting the level of recycled raw materials (40%) and including or increasing renewables’ content in materials (37%).

People at chemical manufacturers accounted for 39% of respondents — 13% were at specialty chemical makers, 12% at commodity chemical producers, 10% at polymer manufacturers, and 4% at fine chemical and intermediate makers — compared to 55% in 2012.

Key factors when considering renewables-based production are customer demand, which was cited by 96% of respondents from chemical makers as very important (68%) or moderately important (28%), safer operations (68%/26%), minimal impact on downstream products and customers (64%/32%) and reduced operating cash cost of production (61%/34%).

Less than half of the respondents at chemical makers (43%) foresee a long-term economic advantage in switching to renewable feedstocks; 29% don’t know whether there will be an advantage.

In contrast, the main factors that consumers of chemicals said affect their consideration of using renewable-based chemicals are minimal impact on product performance or characteristics, which was cited by 96% as very important or moderately important (74%/22%), ability to differentiate products in the marketplace (92% — 61%/31%), customer demand (91% — 60%/31%), potential performance advantage (94% — 55%/39%), minimal impact on processes and facilities (94% — 53%/41%), comparable costs to currently used materials (95% — 52%/43%) and smaller environmental footprint (90% — 46%/44%).

Interest of users in sourcing renewable versions was most pronounced for specialty chemicals (cited by 52%) and polymers (48%).

When asked which developers of technology for sustainable chemicals came to mind, more respondents (32%) picked BASF, followed by Dow (25%), DuPont (21%), Bayer (12%), Genomatica (6%), Shell (5%) and ExxonMobil (5%).

BASF also topped the list of producers of sustainable chemicals that came to mind, cited by 33% of respondents, followed by Dow (28%), DuPont (20%), Bayer (13%), Sabic (6%) and Shell (6%).

BASF also drew the highest ranking when respondents were queried about their overall impression of companies with regard to sustainability. It got very positive marks from 44% of respondents and fairly positive marks from 47%. DuPont came in second (40% and 45%, respectively), closely followed by Genomatica (37%/50%). Dow received very positive ratings from 37% and fairly positive from 43% but also tallied the highest number of negative marks (17% fairly negative and 4% very negative). Bayer got very positive ratings from 36% and fairly positive ratings from 53%.


rosenzweigweb.jpgMARK ROSENZWEIG, Editor in Chief of Chemical Processing, can be e-mailed at mrosenzweig@putman.net.

More from this perspective...

Title

New Museum Really Adds Up

Institution debuting next year intends to inspire interest in mathematics.

05/11/2011

Could You Be the Ultimate Plant Manager?

A new online game lets you compete against others to achieve the best performing site.

04/07/2011

Biofuels Development Gets a Boost

Facility promises to ease scale-up efforts.

03/14/2011

Is Water The New Carbon?

Companies face increasing pressure to disclose, as well as optimize, water use.

02/09/2011

Don't Neglect Energy Auditing

Not properly monitoring compressed air and steam systems is foolish and can be costly.

01/17/2011

Gas Buoys U.S. Chemical Industry Outlook

Abundant supplies of domestic natural gas may open up more feedstock opportunities.

12/20/2010

We Can Learn a Lot from Dow Chemical

Taking a broader view can improve already impressive EH&S performance.

11/16/2010

Don't Slight the Simple Stuff

Vessels and other mundane assets can pose significant risks.

10/28/2010

Is Starting in Production a Wise Career Move?

The first job a newly minted engineer takes may have long-term impact.

09/16/2010

We Need More Engineers in Congress

People with technical backgrounds likely can enhance legislation.

08/11/2010

Rosenzweig's Ramblings October 2009: Industry Safety Initiative Deserves Applause

Chemical Processing's Editor-in-Chief notes that the American Chemistry Council is moving proactively to influence legislation.

07/19/2010

Rosenzweig's Ramblings November 2009: Take a Safe Approach to Safety Equipment

Chemical Processing's Editor-in-Chief urges readers to not risk finding out whether bargains really will work right.

07/19/2010

Rosenzweig's Ramblings December 2009: Grasp All the Lessons of Bhopal

Chemical Processing's Editor-in-Chief is worried that industry still hasn't adequately addressed one factor behind the disaster.

07/19/2010

Rosenzweig's Ramblings February 2010: We Need Another A.C. Gilbert

Chemical Processing's Editor-in-Chief remembers when many engineers of his generation played with Erector Sets when they were growing up.

07/13/2010

Rosenzweig's Ramblings January 2010: Trade Shows Require Rethinking

Chemical Processing's Editor-in-Chief points out that chemical companies continue to face financial pressures. With funds tight for capital expenditures, there's less motivation to send engineers to the show, especially when firms also are curtailing non-essential travel to save money.

07/13/2010

Rosenzweig's Ramblings March 2010: U.S. Lead in Science and Engineering Erodes

Chemical Processing's Editor-in-Chief reports Asian countries are gaining momentum according to the National Science Board's report to the President and Congress on the state of science, engineering and technology in the U.S.

07/13/2010

Look on the Positive Side Of The Oil Spill

The Gulf of Mexico disaster may prompt some welcome developments.

07/12/2010

Rosenzweig's Ramblings May 2010: Obama Tackles Safety Board Vacancies

Chemical Processing's Editor-in-Chief notes that President Barack Obama announced his first nominees for the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB): Rafael Moure-Eraso, Ph.D., to be chair and Mark A. Griffon to be a member. If confirmed, these appointments would bring the board back to a full complement of five members.

07/06/2010

Rosenzweig's Ramblings April 2010: Sustainability Proves Its Worth

Chemical Processing's Editor-in-Chief discusses a study that points to considerable cash flow benefits from better performance. Effectiveness in using resources differs markedly among some major chemical companies and that difference has a significant financial dimension, according to a recent report "Sustainable Value Creation by Chemical Companies."

07/06/2010

Rosenzweig's Ramblings June 2010: Plant Security Deserves More Attention

Chemical Processing's Editor-in-Chief has visited more than a few facilities in his time and, frequently, first impressions can be telling. For instance, it's often apparent from a cursory view how well a site is maintained and the quality of housekeeping.

06/23/2010