Perspectives: From the Editor

Focus, not hocus-pocus

 

By Mark Rosenzweig

You probably can name several companies and perhaps even an association that have been so smitten with emerging or trendy fields that they have neglected or even abandoned their traditional core areas. However, strengths and competencies don't necessarily translate well or lead to leverage in the new fields. So, not surprisingly, the results too often have been disastrous.

Inertia offers no safety, though. Remaining relevant requires continual evolution to keep pace with a changing marketplace, and demands a clear understanding of customer needs and the particular advantages you offer. This certainly applies equally well to technical publishing as to chemicals making.

So, as the chemical industry continues to change, Chemical Processing is evolving, too, to make the magazine even more valuable to you. In doing so, we are guided by a single mandate: to serve the technical information needs of engineers operating and designing chemical plants.

If you are like many engineers, you must contend with a far different work environment than you did just a few years ago. You can call upon fewer people for help and they often have much less experience. Plus, your workload has dramatically increased; so, your time is at a premium.

For Chemical Processing, the message is clear. You need reliable useful information focused specifically on the chemical industry now perhaps more than ever. You don't have time to waste in getting it. You don't want fluff, gimmicks or extraneous material.

Providing that information never has been easy and has become harder given the changes in the chemical industry. And it is spurring redoubled efforts by us.

For instance, take a look at this month's masthead (p.4). In recent months, we have added Agnes Shanley and Nick Basta to our staff. Agnes has a degree in chemistry while Nick is a chemical engineer; both have distinguished records in covering the chemical industry And now I, another chemical engineer, have joined Chemical Processing; hopefully, my name will be familiar from my long tenure at a couple of other magazines in the field. Together, we boast over 70 years of editorial experience related to the chemical industry. And CP is looking to add another technically trained editor.

Staffing up with experienced people is as unusual in publishing nowadays as it is in the chemical industry. But, we consider it essential to do the job we want to do and it underscores our commitment to serving you.

As Editor-in-Chief, my aim is straightforward and unequivocal: to provide authoritative, practical and impartial technical information to help you make plants as efficient, safe and environmentally friendly as possible and to alert you to trends and developments that can keep operations competitive in the future.

Expect to see more input from industry veterans, more advice and insights from engineers dealing with the same operational and design issues that you face. We will be reaching out to such people more than ever as we develop content. One example is our new "Process Puzzler" dept. on p. 81. In addition, we will be setting up an Editorial Board of experienced practitioners to help guide us.

Your input can assist us in serving you better. Please contact me directly with suggestions as to topics that you'd like to see covered, comments on published material, or anything else about the magazine or the chemical industry.

And certainly let me know if you are tempted to write for us. Having an article published in Chemical Processing allows you to share you expertise with the largest audience of engineers at chemical plants of any magazine, and in so doing increases your visibility and enhances your reputation in the field. You might find writing is fun, too. Just send me an abstract or outline ," there's no need to work up a draft ," and I will let you know if your topic and approach are suitable for CP and what if any fine-tuning of focus might be necessary. I strive to make your publishing experience as easy, effective and enjoyable as possible. That's why over the years I have worked with so many repeat authors.

I promise to work hard to bring you the content that you need and deserve. The only thing up my sleeves is some elbow grease.

By Mark Rosenzweig is editor in chief of Chemical Processing  magazine. E-mail him at mrosenzweig@putman.net.

More from this perspective...

Title

Focus, not hocus-pocus

10/23/2003

A welcome package

12/05/2003

A baffling issue?

12/18/2003

Starting the Year Off Right

03/01/2004

A dangerous visit

03/03/2004

A disheartening disconnect

03/29/2004

Sophistication only goes so far

04/02/2004

The evolution continues

05/13/2004

Go outside for internal standards

06/01/2004

Let's honor real gold-medal performances

07/01/2004

Where are chemical engineers headed?

Will opportunities in today's "hot" sectors , such as pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, among others, allow chemical engineering to continue to thrive?

08/05/2004

Stay ahead of your peers

Earning an MBA can take your career in new directions

10/07/2004

It's time to untangle the Web

Our new site goes well beyond the magazine and provides focused, actionable information

11/05/2004

Adapt or perish

Embrace changes in our profession to survive and succeed

11/08/2004

Let's close some glaring gaps

We need effective collaborative efforts to address technical and professional issues

12/06/2004

Process management: Raise an alarm about alarms

Sure, having more alarms is a plus if they contribute to better plant operation.  But nowadays, more and more plants have numerous alarms that are causing more trouble than they are worth.

01/19/2005

The Lark provides a serious lesson for the chemical industry

The key to the long-term vitality of a chemical corporation does not lie in its business acumen, but in its ability to continue to make innovative chemicals. Editor in chief Mark Rosenzweig says executives should show more enthusiasm for this process.

03/10/2005

German company proud of chemical ties

While American companies make an effort to rebuff their chemical industry ties, BASF embraces them.

04/04/2005

Chemical industry and academia must move closer

The 7th World Congress of Chemical Engineering is nearly upon us, and "industry people" need to have a larger presence at these types of meetings, says Editor in Chief Mark Rosenzweig.

05/25/2005

Be careful when getting bids

When getting bids, don't invite trouble, as well as proposals.

06/23/2005