Perspectives: Field Notes

A haphazard approach can hobble hazard reviews

Taking some simple steps can help you avoid common pitfalls in assessing changes

By Dirk Willard, contributing editor

The room grew tense as the reliability engineer complained that the condenser being discussed was slated to be replaced during the next turnaround. The simulator model, the basis of the whole project, didn’t include this change. What had been a plant hazard analysis (PHA) quickly degenerated into a process review.

This is an excellent example of what can go wrong during such evaluations. So, let’s look at what you can do to make your PHA or hazard and operability (HAZOP) study go smoothly.

First, carefully consider the basis for the process change — the reason for the review. What’s the purpose? What’re the options? Of course, the particular situation may limit the choices. Is there a way to avoid safety problems, simplify a process, or reduce hazards? For instance, Can you improve mixing in a reactor and make it smaller? Or Can you eliminate recirculation lines (reducing hazardous inventories)? Which option offers the lowest total cost? Is this the safest option? Consider summarizing the choices in a table. The design team should present these thoughts in a report with a buy-in from the project leader before scheduling a PHA or HAZOP.

With the solution in hand, next account for the plant’s preferences — e.g., for a particular type of flow meter or for RTDs instead of thermocouples. Don’t completely rely on company standards. After all, one unit at the site may prefer steam tracing while another may only accept electric tracing. If these choices pose new safety issues, they need to be considered before the safety review.

Another often missed hazard is scheduling. Can your process change be implemented all at once or will several plant outages be required? Can the plant operate safely with the interim changes? How will other changes in parallel projects affect yours?

Then, of course, there’s operator training — you’ll want to avoid gaps in training. You also should assess how a change will affect operator workload.

Now, you’re ready for the process and instrumentation drawings (P&IDs). First confirm the battery limits and make sure the P&ID you start with is the latest revision. Don’t crowd your P&IDs; leave plenty of room for notes and equipment. When more detail is needed, notes can refer to other documents. Make sure old bubbles are removed. Use color, if possible, to highlight the changes. Don’t be afraid to add a second or third sheet to your drawing set.

Finally, prepare your presentation. Utilize all team members effectively. Don’t assume everyone is familiar with your process or project. Here’s what each attendee will need: 1) P&IDs; 2) process flow diagrams; 3) a material balance; 4) mechanical information; 5) the alarm/trip schedule; 6) the process description; and 7) the purpose of the review and the process changes.

Have reference material on-hand for consideration by your team. For instance, provide a drawing of the entire facility with the area affected by the hazard review highlighted. If equipment will change, create a table comparing the old and the new items. Make available summaries of past PHAs and HAZOPs of the area and accidents with excerpts of concerns listed for discussion during the review if necessary. Time-line via tables the maintenance history of relevant equipment.

Now you’re ready to do your review — but guard against common mistakes.

Hazard reviews often focus too much on operations without considering maintenance. When a new threat appears on the horizon, operation engineers prefer to slap in another instrument rather than use the ones they have in a new way. This adds to the maintenance workload.

Another problem is what I call “the boogie man effect.” Hazard reviews tend to produce unrealistic solutions and imaginary fears. In one case, a caustic scrubber was proposed for a remote unloading facility. Maintaining the scrubber at the proper concentration proved difficult. It sat idle, unfilled, and became a haven for spiders.

Another pitfall is equipment pressure limits. Use the ASME-defined temperatures not the limits for alarms and trips. The code fixes maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP); trips prescribe maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP). Trip settings change; avoid ones above 80% of relief settings because that’s the point when valves start to open.

Once the meeting gets started the facilitator needs to get everyone involved. One idea is to go around the table for the first hour asking for opinions from all. However, maintain discipline once the discussion is started. When a sidebar conversation goes too long, ask those involved to provide an opinion on the question at hand or for a contribution to the main discussion. Sometimes, sidebars produce enlightening ideas.

With a design approach that is methodical and with thoughtful planning in preparation for the PHA or HAZOP, this painful process can effectively serve its purpose.

More from this perspective...

Title

Remember the old reliable orifice plate

The cost-effective dP flow meter is ideal for utility surveys, Senior Editor Dirk Willard says in this month's Chemical Processing Field Notes column.

09/11/2006

Rest Easy With a Good BEDD

A basic engineering data document establishes ground rules.

02/20/2014

Safety Statistics Can Get You into a Scrape

Focusing on minor accidents can foster false perceptions.

12/03/2009

Safety: Douse a Burning Issue

You're not as safe as some fire safety tests may lead you to believe.

10/22/2013

Savor Construction Sites

But make sure the excitement remains enjoyable.

11/17/2011

Sharpen Your Speaking Skills

Oral presentations say a lot about you.

09/05/2012

Silence Kills

Foster an atmosphere where workers speak up about concerns.

09/26/2011

Size Pumps Like a Pro

Use a step-by-step process to avoid pitfalls.

07/01/2010

Solve the real problem

Sometimes solving a problem causes more harm than good.

05/06/2006

Solve the real problem

Sometimes solving a problem causes more harm than good

08/27/2008

Stick to the basics

Getting immersed in details can doom a basic design contract to financial failure.

02/13/2008

Stop Loops Driving You Round the Bend

Practical pointers trump educators' edicts for real-world process control.

01/12/2011

Strike the Right Balance

Make the walk-through your first line of defense, advises Dirk Willard in this month's Field Notes column.

04/30/2007

Succeed at Process Troubleshooting

Take advantage of five easy techniques to find the root cause of problems.

08/08/2011

Survey the Sources of Electrical Risks

A walk-down helps determine the need for purged electrical boxes.

06/14/2011

Take a studied approach to plant studies

Carefully address the challenges of managing and directing specialized teams

03/13/2008

Take the Right Approach to Projects

Remember the real fun begins after approval.

06/12/2009

Take the Write Steps for Career Advancement

The ability to compose clear and effective documents is an important asset.

03/03/2010

Test the Mettle of FRP Tanks

Commissioning and operating such vessels demands special care.

05/09/2012

Treat Rules of Thumb Right When Measuring

These rules can save time but require a strong dose of skepticism.

04/01/2010