Perspectives: Compliance Advisor

2010 Elections Could Impact EPA Programs

Some new senators may take a hard line against EPA program expansion.

By Lynn Bergeson, Regulatory Editor

The 2010 Congressional elections will likely significantly impact policy and legislative developments in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) regulation of chemicals and pesticides. The decline in the number of elected House Democratic members will make for some significant differences in EPA's budget, legislative proposals and general operations. Meanwhile, some newly elected senators stridently oppose government expansion and want to rein in federal deficit spending, which could affect the future of EPA and other government agencies.

Committees of Jurisdiction
Changes in House committee leadership will be monumental. Most notably, Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI) replaces Henry Waxman (D-CA) as House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman. This will affect any prospects for climate legislation, as well as almost every element of EPA's operational programs. The new goal for many interested parties, who a short time ago hoped for expansion of EPA programs, now will be to maintain the current status quo.

EPA's budget will also face an expected spending freeze, and less likely to be allowed exceptions or special initiatives directed by the Appropriations Committee. The new chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), intends to conduct extensive oversight hearings on various programs and agencies.

In the Senate, much less change in committee leadership is expected. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) was reelected, and is expected to continue as chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. Senator Boxer renewed interest in focusing on climate change. Sen. Lautenberg (D-NJ) was not up for reelection, and is expected to continue to champion Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) reform and attempt to keep it high on the Committee agenda.

EPA Appropriations
In addition to any expected freeze in domestic program spending, EPA could face a variety of restrictions or reductions in its operating programs. Some legislators could also attempt to use appropriations restrictions to limit any EPA program or policy, which is speculated to be a real possibility in 2011.

Chemicals Management
The future of EPA's toxics program is one of the most affected by the 2010 election. The possible changes to TSCA during the past two years are moot. The absence of Mr. Waxman in the Senate will have significant implications for TSCA legislation. Sen. Lautenberg is expected to continue to support more extensive changes, but some of the new Senate members are expected to oppose any legislation that seeks to "expand government."

The most interesting question lies with the response of the chemical industry and its allies to the change in House leadership. Notwithstanding the rhetoric of agreeing on many, if not all, of the principles of TSCA reform, industry trade groups or any of their members put forth no legislative proposal. Perhaps now with expected friendlier forums for discussion of TSCA amendments, industry representatives will hesitate less to develop specific amendments they believe will give expression to the stated principles.

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) implementation has been quiet over the first half of the Obama administration. The new Republican majority in the House will likely lead to some level of aggressive oversight of all EPA programs. For the pesticide program, immediate candidates for an increased level of scrutiny include the use of "good science" in decision-making, the use of FIFRA or Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) authority in removing pesticide uses from the market without going through the FIFRA cancellation process, specific product decisions, and transparency and participation in developing new program initiatives.

Administration Reaction
As President Clinton reminded leaders of the Republican "takeover" in 1995, the President remains relevant. Presidents can unilaterally sign Executive Orders or determine priorities under current law. One such example for President Clinton came in 1995 when the President ordered EPA to accelerate the expansion of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) and issued an Executive Order mandating greater TRI reporting obligations on federal contractors. The Obama White House likely will consider similar initiatives.


Lynn L. Bergeson is Chemical Processing's Regulatory Editor. You can e-mail her at Lbergeson@putman.net.
Lynn is managing director of Bergeson & Campbell, P.C., a Washington, D.C.-based law firm that concentrates on chemical industry issues. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author. This column is not intended to provide, nor should be construed as, legal advice.

More from this perspective...

Title

EPA Registers Nanosilver As Active Ingredient

Silver-based antimicrobial pesticide is first such product to gain conditional registration.

12/15/2011

EPA Releases EDSP Management Plan

The assessment program significantly affects many chemicals.

07/26/2012

EPA Releases TSCA Chemical Risk Assessments

Five chemicals found in household products are under close scrutiny.

01/16/2013

EPA Seeks to Lift Stay

Hydrogen sulfide reporting requirements get scrutiny.

05/06/2010

EPA Takes Unprecedented Action

Agency targets several types of "Risk List" chemicals.

01/12/2010

EPA Targets Electric Utilities

The agency steps up efforts to manage coal ash damage.

11/04/2009

EPA Targets Five Chemical Groups

Proposed rules would require companies to report all significant new uses.

04/12/2012

EPA Targets Flame Retardants DecaBDE and BPA

Agency has determined several safer alternatives to using the two chemicals

02/13/2014

EPA Targets Renewable Fuel Fraud

Alternative validation method promises more protection against liabilities.

03/07/2013

EPA Targets Significant New Use Rule-Regulating Articles

A significant new use rule tightly focuses on a particular product.

11/13/2013

EPA Wipes Away Rule

Reusable and disposable solvent-contaminated wipes get exclusion.

08/07/2013

EPA assesses link to greenhouse gases

Steps taken during manufacturing can significantly impact landfill emissions, advises Lynn Bergeson, regulatory editor, in this month's Compliance Advisor column.

09/27/2007

EPA clarifies position on ion-generating equipment

Claims about a product’s ability to kill pests, including germs, can lead to EPA regulation, says Lynn Bergeson, regulatory editor.

10/30/2007

EPA must reconsider carbon dioxide

Court rules that the agency has power to regulate greenhouse gases. Regulator Editor Lynn Bergeson how the ruling came to be and its impace on the industry.

04/24/2007

EPA pushes material-management challenges

The agency is striving to increase cooperative projects with industry to conserve resources.

08/25/2005

EPA seeks to reduce TRI reporting burden

The EPA has proposed a new act in regards to reducing Toxics Release Inventory (TRI). Read here to get the details on how it might affect your plant.

11/27/2005

EPA/Corps Try to Clear Muddied Waters

EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issue joint guidance about Clean Water Act jurisdiction.

12/11/2008

Election Results Impact Chemical Forecast

Federal and state legislation and regulations will likely rev up in the new year

11/26/2012

Expect More Inspections

OSHA’s National Emphasis Program targets more facilities.

10/23/2009

Expect More Water Regulation Everywhere

EPA gets tough on arsenic levels in drinking water

11/18/2008