Perspectives: Compliance Advisor

Workplace Falls Get Fresh Attention

Regulator proposes revised rules to prevent injury.

By Lynn L. Bergeson, Regulatory Editor

The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is tackling a major source of industrial injuries — slips, trips and falls on workplace surfaces. On May 24, OSHA proposed significant revisions to Subparts D and I of the general industry standards dealing with walking-working surfaces and personal protective equipment (PPE), respectively. This column outlines the reasons why OSHA believes changes are needed to protect workers, and key revisions to these standards.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, over 106 million employees work in more than six million establishments regulated by OSHA under its Subpart D standards. Slips, trips and falls constitute 15% of all accidental deaths, a surprisingly high number, and are second only to motor vehicles as a cause of employee fatalities. OSHA's interest in curbing these types of injuries dates back to 1971 when it issued initial standards under Section 6(a) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. In 1990, OSHA proposed to revise the Subpart I standard in conjunction with revisions to the Subpart D standard. In 2003, OSHA reopened the rulemaking record and republished the 1990 proposal to refresh the record due to the protracted period since the original 1990 proposal. The May 2010 proposal replaces the 1990 proposal in its entirety and expands it scope to address more-recent issues and concerns.

Key Proposed Revisions 
The proposal seeks to reflect current industry practices and the provisions of national consensus standards. In addition to clarifying and reorganizing provisions, eliminating duplication and, as OSHA notes, "extensive specification of requirements," the proposal incorporates construction scaffolding standards, thus eliminating the need for most scaffolding specifications in general industry.

Subpart I would gain a new section that would provide criteria for fall protection equipment. The new section is intended to make the general industry standards consistent with existing construction and maritime standards regulating fall protection as well as with current industry practices. The section also is intended to provide clear standards on fall protection PPE to employers.

OSHA proposed to amend a number of general industry standards that establish a duty to use PPE by requiring that PPE meet the new requirements of Subpart I. For example, paragraph (g) of Section 1910.269 requires personal fall arrest systems to meet the requirements of Subpart M of the construction industry requirements. This provision would be revised to require personal fall arrest systems to meet the largely parallel criteria requirements of Subpart I of Part 1910, the general industry requirements. Subpart M of Part 1926 differs from proposed Subpart I in that Subpart M addresses fall arrest systems used in construction of elevator shafts while Subpart I doesn't address the construction of elevator shafts. In addition, Subpart I uses performance language with regard to anchorages for fall arrest systems while Subpart M specifically prohibits the use of guardrails as anchorage points.

Finally, OSHA has proposed to add two non-mandatory appendices to Subpart I to provide examples of test methods and procedures that will assist employers and PPE manufacturers to demonstrate compliance with the criteria proposed in Section 1910.140.

Inputs sought
OSHA requested comment on a long list of topics organized around five key sets of issues: fall protection on rolling stock and motor vehicles; fall protection for employees standing or climbing on stacked materials; qualified climber; building anchorages for rope descent systems; and technological advances in fall protection and fall arrest. Within each issue set, OSHA identified in the Federal Register notice a detailed list of subquestions, review of which will reveal some directional trends on where OSHA's interest may be with respect to a particular area. Comments were due to OSHA on August 23, 2010.

Affected employers were expected to comment extensively on the proposal given the significant impact implementation of the rule is expected to have on them. As is always the case, the value and success in achieving OSHA's goals underlying the final rule will result in large measure from the quality of the information affected employers provide to OSHA as it develops this momentous rule.

In that the rule, if implemented, annually could prevent up to 20 workplace fatalities and over 3,700 injuries (sufficient to incur days away from work), swift promulgation of improved standards will benefit workers. Stay tuned for more information on the status of OSHA's efforts in this regard.


Lynn L. Bergeson is Chemical Processing's Regulatory Editor. You can e-mail her at Lbergeson@putman.net.

Lynn is managing director of Bergeson & Campbell, P.C., a Washington, D.C.-based law firm that concentrates on chemical industry issues. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author. This column is not intended to provide, nor should be construed as, legal advice.

More from this perspective...

Title

Safety Comes First for Nanotechnology

Online guide provides innovative path to product stewardship.

07/13/2009

SCPA Delays Could Impact Industry

Adoption and implementation of potentially "game changing" regulations are now unclear.

01/11/2011

Regulation: Tiny Particles Get Big Attention

Federal, state, international regulations target nanoscale materials.

06/10/2010

Program Targets Toxic "Hot Spots"

EPA rolls out school monitoring air initiative.

04/14/2009

Product stewardship grows globally

Product stewardship is more essential today than ever before. Globally, stewardship initiatives, whether mandatory or voluntary, are emerging with regularity, and their significance should neither be ignored nor underestimated. Here’s why.

01/07/2008

Process safety is a good way to avoid bad consequences

Process safety is an essential component of risk avoidance. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has long recognized the critically important role for process safety awareness.

06/06/2007

Prepare to Report Climate Risks

Pressure mounts on companies to increase required disclosures.

12/07/2009

OSHA Updates PPE Standards

Several key changes help clarify the use of personal protective equipment

03/15/2011

OSHA Releases Final HCS Rule

Chemical manufacturers and importers have until 2016 to comply.

06/14/2012

OSHA Aims to Harmonize Standards

Aligning chemicals labeling with global rules involves major efforts.

03/10/2010

New Inventory Update Rule Reporting Heads Our Way

Proposed rule will significantly impact reporting functions.

10/19/2010

Nanotechnology readies for a wastewater role

The federal government strongly backs development of nanotechnology, seeking to ensure that the United States leads the way in developing and commercializing appropriate applications.

06/27/2005

NTP Proposes to Revise RoC Review Process

Suggested changes aim to address industry concerns.

11/15/2011

NRDC Sues EPA Over Nanosilver

Lawsuit challenges approval of product before all required data are submitted.

02/15/2012

NIOSH makes big effort on small particles

Many federal and international bodies are striving to identify and conduct research to fill data needs in connection with the health and safety implications of nanotechnology.

06/20/2006

Legislators Set Agenda for Change

Regulations are expected to target the chemical industry in 2009.

01/15/2009

Landmark Ruling Affects Pesticide Makers

Litigation likely will lead to changes in how pesticides are reviewed and registered.

04/11/2013

Isotope Fact Sheet Warrants a Close Look

EPA issues guidance to help aid and enforce compliance

07/10/2013

Hazardous chemical shipments face rerouting

DOT issues new railway rules to keep safety and security on right track

06/02/2008

Government Accountability Office Attacks EPA Program

Watchdog office calls for improved assessment and control of chemicals.

05/08/2013