Perspectives: Compliance Advisor

Spotlight Shines on Plant Safety

Efforts underway could significantly revamp process safety policies, regulations and standards

By Lynn Bergeson, regulatory editor

Chemical plant safety is once again in the limelight due to some high profile and very public catastrophes. On January 3, 2014, a federal working group created by the Obama administration’s Executive Order (EO) 13650 issued a set of preliminary options intended to improve chemical plant safety and security. This is a priority topic commanding considerable attention and readers should be aware of and engaged in these developments. This column explains why.

Call for Improved Safety
A little over a year ago, the world was riveted by a major explosion at a West, Texas, fertilizer warehouse. Fifteen people were killed and 160 injured in one of the worst chemical facility disasters in history.

In response to the blast, President Obama signed EO 13650, Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security. The EO established the Chemical Facility Safety and Security Working Group. The EO tasks the working group with considering options to improve and modernize key policies, regulations and standards to enhance the safety and security of chemical facilities. The group includes representatives from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Justice, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and other federal agencies. Each of these bodies has had significant regulatory engagement in chemical safety management.

Preliminary Options
The working group developed a preliminary list of options for improving chemical facility safety and security for further discussion and comment. According to OSHA, the recommendations will serve as a starting point for additional stakeholder discussion. The group offered nine sets of options across several categories and requested comment on each, including mandatory new safeguards. These options comprise “clusters” of issues; actions to address these will have broad and enduring implications for many businesses in the chemical community. The options are:
•    Improving the safe and secure storage, handling, and sale of ammonium nitrate;
•    Process safety improvement and modernization;
•    Coverage of additional hazardous chemicals or categories of chemicals under process safety and security regulations;
•    Chemical reactivity hazards;
•    Explosive chemical hazards;
•    Oil and gas facilities;
•    Coverage of bulk storage of flammable liquids under process safety and security regulations;
•    Process and hazardous chemical security; and
•    Identifying facilities covered under existing process safety and security regulations.

Request for Comment
The working group requested comment on examples of where implementation of the same or similar options have succeeded; information or data that would characterize the positive impacts the options might have, including additional benefits; potential limitations or unintended consequences of the options described; methods for implementing the options, including methods for potentially increasing benefits or reducing costs; and alternatives to the options that could achieve substantially the same result.

It’s apparent from the list of options that the agencies comprising the working group are considering additional and new regulations. For example, the working group states that “[t]he agencies are considering whether to initiate rulemakings for updating the PSM [Process Safety Management] standard and RMP [Risk Management Program] rule.  The EPA and OSHA have collaborated on implementation of these programs, and are considering a number of options for modernizing regulations, policy and guidance that would maintain parallel requirements and ensure harmony between the regulations.” The agencies also are considering expanding the scope of chemicals regulated under the PSM standard and RMP rule.

The workings of the interagency taskforce are critically important to the chemical community and the industries it serves. This type of regulatory “gap analysis” will require significant engagement from regulated sectors to ensure the working group is fully informed and able to make prudent decisions.

Although the comment period closed in March, the solicitation for public comment document is a must read as it provides a useful summary of the federal regulation of chemical facilities and offers significant insight into where new regulatory authority may be directed.


bergeson-color.jpgLYNN BERGESON is Chemical Processing's Regulatory Editor. You can e-mail her at lbergeson@putman.net

Lynn is managing director of Bergeson & Campbell, P.C., a Washington, D.C.-based law firm that concentrates on conventional, biobased, and nanoscale chemical industry issues. She served as chair of the American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources (2005-2006).

More from this perspective...

Title

SCPA Delays Could Impact Industry

Adoption and implementation of potentially "game changing" regulations are now unclear.

01/11/2011

Safety Comes First for Nanotechnology

Online guide provides innovative path to product stewardship.

07/13/2009

Regulation: Tiny Particles Get Big Attention

Federal, state, international regulations target nanoscale materials.

06/10/2010

Program Targets Toxic "Hot Spots"

EPA rolls out school monitoring air initiative.

04/14/2009

Product stewardship grows globally

Product stewardship is more essential today than ever before. Globally, stewardship initiatives, whether mandatory or voluntary, are emerging with regularity, and their significance should neither be ignored nor underestimated. Here’s why.

01/07/2008

Process safety is a good way to avoid bad consequences

Process safety is an essential component of risk avoidance. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has long recognized the critically important role for process safety awareness.

06/06/2007

Prepare to Report Climate Risks

Pressure mounts on companies to increase required disclosures.

12/07/2009

OSHA Updates PPE Standards

Several key changes help clarify the use of personal protective equipment

03/15/2011

OSHA Releases Final HCS Rule

Chemical manufacturers and importers have until 2016 to comply.

06/14/2012

OSHA Aims to Harmonize Standards

Aligning chemicals labeling with global rules involves major efforts.

03/10/2010

NTP Proposes to Revise RoC Review Process

Suggested changes aim to address industry concerns.

11/15/2011

NRDC Sues EPA Over Nanosilver

Lawsuit challenges approval of product before all required data are submitted.

02/15/2012

NIOSH makes big effort on small particles

Many federal and international bodies are striving to identify and conduct research to fill data needs in connection with the health and safety implications of nanotechnology.

06/20/2006

New Inventory Update Rule Reporting Heads Our Way

Proposed rule will significantly impact reporting functions.

10/19/2010

Nanotechnology readies for a wastewater role

The federal government strongly backs development of nanotechnology, seeking to ensure that the United States leads the way in developing and commercializing appropriate applications.

06/27/2005

Legislators Set Agenda for Change

Regulations are expected to target the chemical industry in 2009.

01/15/2009

Landmark Ruling Affects Pesticide Makers

Litigation likely will lead to changes in how pesticides are reviewed and registered.

04/11/2013

Isotope Fact Sheet Warrants a Close Look

EPA issues guidance to help aid and enforce compliance

07/10/2013

Hazardous chemical shipments face rerouting

DOT issues new railway rules to keep safety and security on right track

06/02/2008

Government Accountability Office Attacks EPA Program

Watchdog office calls for improved assessment and control of chemicals.

05/08/2013