Perspectives: Compliance Advisor

Chemical Compliance: California Calls for Changes to Prop 65

Proposal seeks to include more detailed information on warning labels.

By Lynn Bergeson, regulatory editor

On March 7, 2014, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) released a proposal for a draft regulation amending Proposition 65 regulations.  The proposal seeks changes to the warning requirements to include more detailed information, including the names of the chemicals covered by individual warnings, the ways that individuals are exposed to these chemicals, and how individuals can avoid or reduce their exposure to these chemicals. This column explains this proposal and its significance.

PROPOSED CHANGES
The proposal "is to improve the quality of Proposition 65 warnings while providing both flexibility and certainty for businesses." The following are the minimum required core elements for warnings that this proposal would establish:

Pictogram: Proposed Section 25607.2(a)(1) would require the inclusion of the following standard (Globally Harmonized System) pictogram:

This pictogram would have to appear on all Proposition 65 consumer product warnings, with limited exceptions for food products, drugs and medical devices; occupational warnings; and environmental warnings.

Warning Signal Word: Proposed Section 25607.2(a)(2) would require that the signal word "WARNING" appear in all capital letters and bold print. 

"Expose": The current warning is:  "WARNING:  This area contains a chemical known to the State of California to cause [cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm]." Proposed changes would modify this to "WARNING:  This product will expose you to a chemical [or chemicals] known to the State of California to cause [cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm]."

Chemical Name Disclosure: Proposed Section 25605 would require disclosure of the following 12 chemicals in the text of the warning:  acrylamide; arsenic; benzene; cadmium; chlorinated tris; 1,4-dioxane; formaldehyde; lead; mercury; phthalates; tobacco smoke; and toluene.

New Website: Proposed Section 25604 would require on the label a link to a new OEHHA-hosted website (www.P65Warnings.ca.gov) to allow the public to access more information relating to the warning, including additional chemicals, routes of exposure, and if applicable, any actions that individuals could take to reduce or avoid the exposure.  

Opportunity to Cure: To avoid frivolous litigation, proposed Section 25607 includes a new "Opportunity to Cure" provision that would provide small retailers (establishments with 25 or fewer employees) an opportunity to address certain minor warning violations (e.g., a short-term absence of a sign or inadvertent obstruction of a warning label or sign) if the retailer was previously in compliance; the violation is not due to intentional neglect or disregard of the regulations, not avoidable using customary quality control or maintenance; and the violation is corrected within 24 hours of discovery or notification, or within 14 days where software equipment must be repaired or replaced.

DISCUSSION
The proposed changes provide additional guidance regarding Proposition 65 warnings (e.g., recognizing warnings covered by existing court-approved settlements) that may help some in industry and expand provisions to prevent frivolous lawsuits. However, the proposal also includes game-changing additional warning requirements that are sure to inspire controversy for companies that manufacture, distribute or sell consumer products with Proposition 65 warnings.

OEHHA states its proposal is intended to provide more meaningful information for individuals in Proposition 65 warnings, facilitate the public's understanding and make the warnings more consistent. However, it's possible these changes could have the opposite effect. Because the proposed changes would significantly increase the mandatory elements of a warning, create different warning requirements for a multitude of specific circumstances and require companies to compile and report burdensome exposure information, the regulations could create more compliance and consistency issues while also causing confusion for the general public.

NEXT STEPS
OEHHA is encouraging parties to submit written comments via e-mail, rather than in paper form, by May 14, 2014. OEHHA has stated its intent to propose formal regulations in early summer 2014 and adopt final regulations in early summer 2015. There also are plans to develop a website concurrent with the regulatory process.

Companies should review carefully the proposal and how the significant changes to the warning requirements will affect their cost and compliance capabilities. The draft regulation and Initial Statement of Reasons are available for public review on OEHHA's website at http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/warnings/030714warningworkshop.html.


bergeson-color.jpgLYNN BERGESON is Chemical Processing's Regulatory Editor. You can e-mail her at lbergeson@putman.net

Lynn is managing director of Bergeson & Campbell, P.C., a Washington, D.C.-based law firm that concentrates on conventional, biobased, and nanoscale chemical industry issues. She served as chair of the American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources (2005-2006).

More from this perspective...

Title

Ultrafine Particles Come Under the Microscope

07/01/2004

The essentiality of process-safety management

The Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) says revision of the Process Safety Management standard is necessary, but OSHA disagrees.

05/25/2005

Nanotechnology readies for a wastewater role

The federal government strongly backs development of nanotechnology, seeking to ensure that the United States leads the way in developing and commercializing appropriate applications.

06/27/2005

Biomonitoring assumes growing significance

Greater emphasis on chemicals uptake is raising the role of this safety tool.

07/25/2005

EPA pushes material-management challenges

The agency is striving to increase cooperative projects with industry to conserve resources.

08/25/2005

Wade in on water pollutant detection

An EPA initiative provides a mechanism for helping to shape pending actions.

09/27/2005

EPA seeks to reduce TRI reporting burden

The EPA has proposed a new act in regards to reducing Toxics Release Inventory (TRI). Read here to get the details on how it might affect your plant.

11/27/2005

The importance of waste minimization

It makes good environmental, economic, and business sense.

12/21/2005

What does EPA have in store?

Don’t expect any major changes in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations during 2006. Here’s a summary of trends and developments anticipated this year.

02/17/2006

Develop an air-tight defense

Chemical processors face significant challenges in controlling fugitive emissions. The emissions escape from valves, compressors, pumps, piping components, etc. It is a difficult task, but necessary to avoid penalties and other liability.

04/24/2006

NIOSH makes big effort on small particles

Many federal and international bodies are striving to identify and conduct research to fill data needs in connection with the health and safety implications of nanotechnology.

06/20/2006

Small sensors promise big impact

Because many environmental applications of nanotechnology will almost certainly revolutionize the science, law, and regulation of water pollution, readers are urged to keep abreast of this fast-changing area.

06/28/2006

The impact of the European Union's directives on the U.S.

The Restrictions of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (the RoHS Directive) is part of a growing wave of European Union product-based regulations that will profoundly impact global and United States product standards — and thus the chemical industry.

08/17/2006

Biomonitoring gets a going-over

The current state of biomonitoring is detailed in the much anticipated report issued July 24 by the Committee on Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Toxicants of the National Academies, Washington, D.C.

09/11/2006

Expect tighter particulate matter standards

Tighter particulate matter standards are in our future, according to Regulatory Editor Lynn Bergeson in this month's Compliance Advisor column on ChemicalProcessing.com

09/21/2006

Get answers to your biomonitoring questions

Guidance for chemical manufacturers, processors, and distributors about Section 8(e) of the Toxic Substances control act was issued on September 14, by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Chemical Processing's Regulatory Editor Lynn Bergeson discusses the new regulation.

10/24/2006

Wal-Mart applies clout

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., previously committed to reduce by 5% the packaging used by its 60,000 suppliers by 2013. Now, a new initiative uses a scorecard to tackle wasteful packaging.

12/05/2006

Exporters get reporting relief

EPA eases annual reporting requirements and thresholds, and exporters are feeling relief, according to Lynn Bergeson in her monthly Compliance Advisor column.

01/08/2007

Chemical security rules edge forward

Advance rulemaking was recently issued on anti-terrorism standards. Lynn Bergeson provides a summary in monthly Compliance Advisor column.

02/12/2007

Chemicals transport faces worldly issues

Global classification and labeling system aims to boost safety, Lynn Bergeson says in this month's Compliance Advisor column.

03/01/2007