Perspectives: Compliance Advisor

Ultrafine Particles Come Under the Microscope

 

Nanotechnology is an umbrella term for the science and technology of controlling the structure and properties of materials and systems at the scale of 10-9 meters , 1/100,000 the width of a human hair, or less than 0.1 . Growth projections for nanotechnology applications are 33% a year, according to the National Science Foundation, which has estimated that by 2015 such applications may total $1 trillion in the global economy. The federal government's support of nanotechnology is illustrated by Congress's swift enactment of The 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act on Dec. 3, 2003. This authorizes $3.7 billion over four years in federal support for nanotechnology.

The strong growth prospects of nanotechnology are prompting an increase in government attention to the potential health effects of nano- and other ultrafine particles (UFPs), which can be even smaller: less than 0.01 . So, this column reviews this interest and the nascent stage of research into these health effects.

Are there health risks?

Questions about the health risks posed by nanotechnology have arisen in the last few years. Almost all of the current, modest body of research relates to naturally occurring UFPs rather than particles produced by nanotechnology. UFPs are ubiquitous in urban areas, in the form of combustion soot, diesel exhaust particles, and products of gasoline exhaust and industrial processes.

Research so far on health effects is limited. Some studies link UFPs with respiratory tract toxicity and indicate that UFPs pose a greater risk of producing an inflammatory response in the lungs than larger particles. These studies show the ability of UFPs to cross the blood-brain barrier, which has the potential to adversely affect the central nervous system. Most recently, on June 1, the American Heart Association issued a statement that exposure to airborne particulate matter poses an increased risk of death due to heart disease. According to the statement, several studies link a greater incidence of heart disease with exposure to particulate pollution. Some experts say that such UFPs ultimately may present a far more substantial health threat than particulate byproducts of nanotechnology applications.

Researchers recommend undertaking inhalation studies to try to discover the operative toxicity mechanisms causing these adverse effects. The federal government agrees, and several federal agencies, including the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the National Toxicity Program (NTP), EPA, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), are engaged in such research.

Some work will focus specifically on nanomaterials. For instance, NTP intends to evaluate in research animals the toxic and carcinogenic potential of inhalation exposure to quantum dots (tiny devices that contain a droplet of free electrons) and nanotubes. EPA also is slated to initiate $4 million in research beginning in fiscal year 2004 to investigate the toxicology of certain manufactured nanomaterials.

Occupational hazards also are a primary focus of current government concern. NIOSH has staked out nanotechnology as a key research area and is now developing a National Nanotechnology Research Center to coordinate its research initiatives. NIOSH acknowledges that more research is necessary to understand the effects of exposure to nanoparticles.

Another area NIOSH has identified for further study is the potential toxicity of nanoparticles that contact skin. In vitro assays have yielded strong evidence of oxidative stress and the destruction of dermal cell structure. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between nanoparticles and dermal sensitization or irritation.

The research now underway will shed more light on the toxicity of UFPs and nanoparticles. Companies employing or planning to use nanotechnology should monitor these developments to ensure that their practices and hazard communication strategies remain current and fully reflect health effects research in these areas.

By Lynn Bergeson, regulatory editor. She is a founding shareholder of Bergeson & Campbell, P.C., a Washington, D.C.-based law firm concentrating on chemical industry issues. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author.

More from this perspective...

Title

California Aims For Safer Consumer Products

Proposed regulations include establishing a "chemicals of concern" list.

08/23/2012

Compliance: Source of Minerals Gets New Scrutiny

New rule offers framework for disclosing materials originating from conflict regions.

09/25/2012

EPA Plans to Improve IRIS Process

Mandated review may determine how best to update chemical health effects database.

10/25/2012

Election Results Impact Chemical Forecast

Federal and state legislation and regulations will likely rev up in the new year

11/26/2012

EPA Keeps Close Eye on Cadmium

Precedent-setting rule requires manufacturers to submit health and safety studies.

12/13/2012

EPA Releases TSCA Chemical Risk Assessments

Five chemicals found in household products are under close scrutiny.

01/16/2013

Work Safely with Nanomaterials

OSHA provides basic information on potential hazards associated with nanotechnology.

02/15/2013

EPA Targets Renewable Fuel Fraud

Alternative validation method promises more protection against liabilities.

03/07/2013

Landmark Ruling Affects Pesticide Makers

Litigation likely will lead to changes in how pesticides are reviewed and registered.

04/11/2013

Government Accountability Office Attacks EPA Program

Watchdog office calls for improved assessment and control of chemicals.

05/08/2013

Chemical Safety Standards Could Get Overhauled

Latest approach to TSCA reform addresses some industry concerns.

06/11/2013

Isotope Fact Sheet Warrants a Close Look

EPA issues guidance to help aid and enforce compliance

07/10/2013

EPA Wipes Away Rule

Reusable and disposable solvent-contaminated wipes get exclusion.

08/07/2013

California Cracks Down On Chemicals

Final regulations evaluate the safety of chemicals in consumer products.

09/16/2013

Toxic Chemicals: Prepare for Product Regulations

Taking several steps now can significantly impact future operations.

10/15/2013

EPA Targets Significant New Use Rule-Regulating Articles

A significant new use rule tightly focuses on a particular product.

11/13/2013

EPA Amends TSCA Reporting Obligations

Documents can now be filed electronically

12/17/2013

What Can We Expect From EPA in 2014?

A wide variety of ongoing efforts should move ahead this year.

01/20/2014

EPA Targets Flame Retardants DecaBDE and BPA

Agency has determined several safer alternatives to using the two chemicals

02/13/2014

Toxic Substance Control Act Reform Nears

House releases discussion draft of Toxic Substance Control Act reform legislation.

03/18/2014