Print page

Print page

Calculating the Agitator Torque For Adhesive Production

Q: We are trying to calculate the agitator torque for adhesive production. What size electrical motor and gearbox is required to drive this agitator? How about with a hydraulic drive?

Here are the specs:

ID of reactor is 1,250 mm
Height of reactor is 2,360 mm
Rod diameter is 80 mm
Agitator has two 45-degree pitched blades
Length of blade is 530 mm
Diameter of agitator with blade is 1,140 mm
Material viscosity is 100,000 cp
Require speed is variable from 30 to 100 rpm
Density of material is 1250 kg/m³

A:

Although this design is unusual, including both the impellers and baffles, it may be able to mix 100,000 cp adhesive, so long as the material is not too visco-elastic.

No way do you want to run this mixer at 120 rpm, not even in water.  In polymer, the power required is 112 kW with 28,700 N.m torque.  You would effectively boil or decompose any adhesive in a mater of minutes.  Even in water at 120 rpm, this mixer would require a 56 kW motor with similar results.  The maximum speed and power that the shaft could tolerate, even with the steady bearing is about 70 rpm, which would require a 37 kW motor and 9,600 N.m of torque.  A higher torque would break the shaft.
 
A practical and effective design would run at 37 rpm and require an 11 kW motor with 2,870 N.m of torque.  A lower speed may be as effective or more effective at high viscosity.  Some materials need time to flow after the impeller blade passes through the material.  Whether you use an electric motor or hydraulic drive, the power required by the impellers remains the same.
 

Here are more of the latest questions on: Mixing

How do I select the optimal location for an impeller inside a tank?
I am new to tank mixing and I have a question about selecting the optimal location (and orientation) for an impeller inside a tank. I am dealing with a tank that contains very light materials (0.7 and 0.8 SG). The contents have been sitting in the tank and are stratified. Please let me know if there is some sort of general process for selecting the proper impeller position.

The tank is 120 ft. in diameter, 45 ft. high. It is allowed to only have one mixer. The first layer of material has a specific gravity of 0.75 is 32 ft. high. The second layer of the tank has a specific gravity of 0.67 and is 10 ft. high; making the total contents of the tank 42 ft. high. The purpose of the mixer is to have complete mixing within 6 hours.

Is a UDIF impeller suitable?
We have been using a UDIF agitator for emulsion polymerization mixing for 1cp to 8,000 cp. Is this type of agitator suitable for mixing?

What kind of agitator is suitable for a range of viscosities?
Our process dissolves several types of polymers in appropriate solvents. During the solving process, the viscosity might reach to the value of 8,000 cp. Our vessel dimension is 30 cm in diameter and 70 cm in height. What kind of agitator is suitable for this purpose?

What is the best way to approach gas-gas mixing?
I want to mix two low viscous gas streams in laminar regime. I am planning to mix them by passing through a pipe filled with spherical pebbles or some structured packing. I want to calculate the length required for the mixing expected. My required process stream details are as follows:

Q = 1Nm³/hr
He= 0.99
H₂= 0.01
P= 1.2 bar
Dia of pipe = 1/2 inch
Temp= 25 degrees C

I have gone through the text book "Handbook of Industrial Mixing." But that textbook has procedure for only commercially available static mixers. Please guide me through the design. Is dispersion model helpful in finding the length? If so, how?

We would like to have a general idea of pumping number for our reactors. Can you help us with blend-time calculations?
To characterize one of the reactors at plant scale, we use the discoloration method. The parameters for the mixing time are calculated based according to the following formula:

t_mix= K/(aN(D/T)^b (T/Z)^0.5 )
N = impeller speed
D = diameter stirrer
T = diameter tank
Z = liquid height
The divisor is known as Kmix

Because we don't really know the uniformity (U) reached with this method we don't replace K with

K = -ln (1-U)

But get the best fit for K, a and b by means of the least square method. It is known that the pumping number can be determined by

N_Q= (Vk_mix)/(ND^3 )

We would like to have a general idea of pumping number for our reactors. So if we would like to deviate the pumping number from the above method would it be correct that for T=Z (so at a fixed volume based on the reactor geometry) we use the following formula.

N_Q= (VaN(D/T)^b)/(ND^3 )

Working in a turbulent regime, this result in a constant pumping number related to the tank geometry. Would the above approach be correct to compare pumping and mixing time capabilities of different reactor set ups? I think that not working at a fixed uniformity results in a gap in the above approach.

Back to Ask the Experts