Understanding The Baffle Effect

Q: I have a reactor with:

• Tank Diameter = 2.736 m
• Volume = 24 cubic meters
• 2 Baffles = D-Baffles for glass lined tanks;
• The distance from reactor wall is 0.723 m
• 1 rushton 6 flat bladed turbine with W/D = 0.2 and impeller D = 1.012 m
• Fluid density = 835 Kg/cubic meter @220°C
• Fluid viscosity = 18.1 cP @220°C
• N = 120.7 rpm

• With the equation P = Np * density *N^3*D^5
• Np = 5.2 for standard rushton with turbulent conditions
• P = 37.52 KW, considering our driver and gear reducer efficiency = 41.14 KW.

We monitored the power consumption directly on the driver, and we obtained power consumption much lower than calculations (about 26 - 27 KW). I probably have to use a power correction factor because of D-Baffles, then the power should be lower. Can you suggest the correction factor for this kind of baffles?

A:

Power correction factors for glass-lined vessels and different baffle arrangements are very limited. The typical power data for glass-lined vessels has just one baffle and  shows gradual decreases in power number as the Reynolds number increases in the  turbulent range.  That reduction in power is associated with swirling of the vessel contents.

For the effect of two baffles, the attached graph shows different numbers of baffles and different fractions of  baffle width, with the standard baffles being four (4) baffles with a width  of 1/12 the tank diameter.  Your data would suggest that you have the effect of two (2) baffles 3/4 of the standard width, giving you about 70%  of full power.
 
The effect of baffles in most glass-line reactors is limited to upper tank effects, including surface motion.  The baffles have almost no effect below the ends of the baffles, where the impeller is located typically.  A paper from a few years ago looked at flow patterns in glass-lined reactors:

"Understand Flow Patterns in Glass-Lined Reactors," Chemical Engineering Progress, pp. 21-25, (November 2004), Dickey, D. S., Kevin J. Bittorf, Christopher J. Ramsey, and Keith E. Johnson.

I hope this information helps answer your question.  The measurements obtained for your system seem quite reasonable and are probably better than predicted values would be.

Baffle Effect graph: http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/Media/MediaManager/Baffle_Effect.pdf.

Here are more of the latest questions on: Mixing

How do I select the optimal location for an impeller inside a tank?
I am new to tank mixing and I have a question about selecting the optimal location (and orientation) for an impeller inside a tank. I am dealing with a tank that contains very light materials (0.7 and 0.8 SG). The contents have been sitting in the tank and are stratified. Please let me know if there is some sort of general process for selecting the proper impeller position.

The tank is 120 ft. in diameter, 45 ft. high. It is allowed to only have one mixer. The first layer of material has a specific gravity of 0.75 is 32 ft. high. The second layer of the tank has a specific gravity of 0.67 and is 10 ft. high; making the total contents of the tank 42 ft. high. The purpose of the mixer is to have complete mixing within 6 hours.

Is a UDIF impeller suitable?
We have been using a UDIF agitator for emulsion polymerization mixing for 1cp to 8,000 cp. Is this type of agitator suitable for mixing?

What kind of agitator is suitable for a range of viscosities?
Our process dissolves several types of polymers in appropriate solvents. During the solving process, the viscosity might reach to the value of 8,000 cp. Our vessel dimension is 30 cm in diameter and 70 cm in height. What kind of agitator is suitable for this purpose?

What is the best way to approach gas-gas mixing?
I want to mix two low viscous gas streams in laminar regime. I am planning to mix them by passing through a pipe filled with spherical pebbles or some structured packing. I want to calculate the length required for the mixing expected. My required process stream details are as follows:

Q = 1Nm³/hr
He= 0.99
H₂= 0.01
P= 1.2 bar
Dia of pipe = 1/2 inch
Temp= 25 degrees C

I have gone through the text book "Handbook of Industrial Mixing." But that textbook has procedure for only commercially available static mixers. Please guide me through the design. Is dispersion model helpful in finding the length? If so, how?

We would like to have a general idea of pumping number for our reactors. Can you help us with blend-time calculations?
To characterize one of the reactors at plant scale, we use the discoloration method. The parameters for the mixing time are calculated based according to the following formula:

t_mix= K/(aN(D/T)^b (T/Z)^0.5 )
N = impeller speed
D = diameter stirrer
T = diameter tank
Z = liquid height
The divisor is known as Kmix

Because we don't really know the uniformity (U) reached with this method we don't replace K with

K = -ln (1-U)

But get the best fit for K, a and b by means of the least square method. It is known that the pumping number can be determined by

N_Q= (Vk_mix)/(ND^3 )

We would like to have a general idea of pumping number for our reactors. So if we would like to deviate the pumping number from the above method would it be correct that for T=Z (so at a fixed volume based on the reactor geometry) we use the following formula.

N_Q= (VaN(D/T)^b)/(ND^3 )

Working in a turbulent regime, this result in a constant pumping number related to the tank geometry. Would the above approach be correct to compare pumping and mixing time capabilities of different reactor set ups? I think that not working at a fixed uniformity results in a gap in the above approach.

Back to Ask the Experts