Calculate static discharge head

In this case, my final destination is 2 m from the ground, but my discharge line has to travel 6 m up on the pipe rack. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the second option. In this case, if my total head (developed head) is greater than 6 m or 5.3 m (i.e. max manometric head of system), then the pump will work and it will not be necessary to consider 5.3 m as static discharge head. Please clarify.

A: Your numbers are confusing, but here's the rule. The Total Dynamic Head required from a pump is as follows:

TDH = Static Head + Friction Losses + Dynamic Head

The static head is measured from the free surface of the liquid in the supply source to the free surface of the liquid in the discharge chamber, or to the highest point in the line.

As you do not identify the elevation of the free surface of the liquid in the supply source, we can only advise you on the discharge static head, which is only half of the total static head.

If we assume a static head basis of the pump centerline, then there are two discharge static heads; one when the highest point in the line becomes a factor at 6.0 m. above ground elevation.  The other is when the high points in the line become full of liquid, a siphon effect kicks in, and the lower discharge static head reverts to 2.0 m. above ground elevation.

The friction losses must include all friction losses in all piping, valves and fixtures in the line. The dynamic head is the increase in velocity within the pump itself. I trust this will help you complete your calculations.

Here are more of the latest questions on: Pumps

Why are we experiencing anti-rotating device failures at an alarming rate?
We have three circulating water vertical pumps and we are experiencing anti-rotating device failures at an alarming rate. The discharge line is 72 inches. All the parameters have been checked and we are still clueless of the problem. Pump Detail Equipment description: Circulating Water Pump
Equipment Tag No. : CW-PP-002 (A/B/C)
Type: Vertical Flow Sump Pump
Model: 1800HV
Head: 17m
Capacity: 17280 m³/h
Shaft power: 971 kW
Speed: 495 rpm
Pump height:10m
Weight (pump): 30 ton
Weight (motor): 20 ton
Manufacturer: Shenyang Pump Manufactory, China

Is dynamic balancing important?
I have always been told that dynamic balancing is not as critical on impellers because as soon as the impeller is loaded, the water causes hydraulic imbalance. We have always balanced them down to NEMA standards anyway, but it would be nice to know for sure.

Does the velocity in the suction line need to be maintained?
In a new installation, the supplier has erected a suction pipe of 3 inches connected to suction nozzle of 4 inches in the centrifugal pump for slurry application. The general engineering practice says the suction pipe should be the same or one size larger than the suction nozzle of the pump. As per supplier, this arrangement was made to maintain slurry speed of >1.5m/sec. With this condition, we are having frequent seal failures. Please suggest whether this type of suction pipe sizing is acceptable. And is it required to maintain slurry speed in the suction side as given by supplier?

What are the disadvantages of putting a strainer on the discharge of a pump?
What are the disadvantages of putting a strainer on the discharge of a pump?

What is causing the strainer to choke?
We have an ammonia recovery system at our ammonia plant. Ammonia is recovered in a scrubber operating at 105 Kg/cm² with lean water. Water is pumped through a PD pump. Basket type strainer is installed at pump suction line in vertical position. Chocking problem is frequently observed with this strainer with algae layer due to which pump flow reduces to minimum. What do you recommend?

Back to Ask the Experts