Home » Automation IT » Avoid excessive heat flux
Avoid excessive heat flux
Q: How does one set the constraints (startup or operation) to avoid excessive heat flux or pressure change that result in bumping or boil over of an evaporator or batch stripper, especially at vacuum? What correlations for pressure change and or heat flux would be used to establish prudent rate of change constraints?
A: It seems to me that a boil over occurs when the bubble holdup volume added to the liquid volume exceeds the vessel's operating volume. Surface level detection devices such as radar might indicate the swell in total volume.
The bubble holdup volume can be approximated as the bubble rise time multiplied by the volumetric vapor rate determined by the heat flux rate of heat input divided by the heat of vaporization for the process fluid and the density of the vapor. However, I am not sure how to generalize a calculation of the bubble rise time. Also, my experience is that a boil over develops very rapidly possibly indicating a drastic change in bubble path and hence rise time.
A more empirical method would be to compare an unfiltered velocity limited rate of change of vessel pressure or pressure drop across the vent valve to a baseline rate of change. The baseline value is a heavily filtered average rate of change. Any significant increase in the unfiltered velocity limited rate of change would signal an impending boil-over. The velocity limiting helps screen out noise from triggering a false indication of a boil-over. Also, passing the velocity limited signal through a dead time block and computing the rate of change as the difference between the input (new value) and the output (old valve) of the dead time block divided by the block dead time can improve the signal to noise ratio. Here, the block dead time is chosen just large enough to show a true change in pressure. Not that the block dead time does not affect the speed of response since the input to the dead time block is used in the computation of the rate of change.
Whether this method works fast enough depends upon the process dead time. If the signal is noise, some light filtering might need to be applied before sending the pressure signal through the velocity limit block. Also, on startup, it may be necessary to initially turn off filtering and velocity limiting until the vessel reaches operating conditions.
Here are more of the latest questions on: Instrumentation and Control
Can you explain a split range controller?
Regarding split range controller:
- Is it normal to have a control valve with two different sizes?
- Why use a split range controller and where can we it?
- My application: I am planning to use at outlet of condenser. The outlet will have condensate liquid and non-condensate vapor. Will it work here?
Can you explain linearity and accuracy of flowmeters?
I am confused on linearity and accuracy of flowmeters such as oval meters. In some references they are mentioned as the same but in some others they are not the same. Should I only rely on linearity for selection for measuring custody transfer or another flowmeter characteristic?
Can you recommend a flowmeter?
We are going to install a flowmeter for lube oil loading as custody transfer. The flowrate may alter between 140-280 CMH (two-speed motor) having viscosity 150cSt at 40C. Simple installation and setting up on the line and reasonable cost as well as pressure drop are preferred. The pump can generate 8barg pressure. What would be the recommended flow measuring type to support the requested service?
Where should I install the control valve on the hot oil line?
I am going to use hot oil for heating a process in a jacketed vessel and I am going to make a control loop for controlling the vessel content. The hot oil enters at the bottom of the jacket and exits from the top. The control elements are RTD, controller, and control valve. My question: Where should I install the control valve on the hot oil line? Is it up stream or down stream of the vessel?
Why is there a discrepancy of solids at sampling points?
Ours is a fertilizer industry and within the premises we transfer phosphoric acid from the phosphoric acid production facility to the fertilizer production facility. The distance of the pipeline might be around 400m but the difference in issue and receipts generally comes out to be 100s of tons per day. Can you tell me what could be the possible problem? Other info required:
- Phosphoric acid has around 5% solids
- Sampling point in phosphoric acid tank is at the bottom
- Sampling point in the fertilizer plant is at a higher level(25 ft) and is preceded by a lot of bends.
Print page