Optimize Reactive Crystallization

Understanding the impact of several key factors is crucial.

By Wayne J. Genck, Genck International

2 of 2 1 | 2 > View on one page

A critical factor in both micro- and mesomixing times is the feed pipe location. A change in the size distribution at modified feed pipe locations indicates a mixing dependence. If no substantial variations exist, a different system property such as nucleation induction time may be slow compared to micromixing. If the reaction is slow, it may occur in the bulk mixing volumes of the vessel.

Organic species, in particular, demonstrate a wide range of nucleation induction times. The faster times are on the order of milliseconds, which is comparable to micromixing times in agitated vessels. In this case, agitation will significantly impact particle formation. The addition of reactant feed into poorly mixed volumes in the vessel can extend micromixing and mesomixing times by up to several orders of magnitude, thereby making mixing more important even with longer nucleation induction times. Particle formation is even more complex when the reaction times bracket these time frames.

To minimize nucleation while maximizing growth, it's important to achieve micromixing of the two reactants faster than the nucleation induction and reaction times, while also providing adequate meso- and macromixing to create a controlled rate of supersaturation generation. Seed surface area and controlled mass transfer to the growing crystals can encourage growth. However, excessive mixing can decrease the induction time, thereby increasing nucleation as well as crystal breakage and secondary nucleation. This underlines the importance of appropriate agitator design and power input.

This is critical due to its relationship to reaction and mixing time. At the feed point, mixing, reaction and nucleation may be occurring within the same time frame in series or in parallel depending upon the time constants. If they happen in parallel, agitation at the molecular level may not be completed before the initiation of reaction. If the induction time is also short, inclusion of unreacted substrate in the nucleation mass at high supersaturation is possible. In this case, the times for mixing (Tmix), reaction (Tr) and induction (Tind) are approximately equal:

Tmix ~ Tr ~ Tind

Ideally, the mixing at a local level should be adequate to achieve reactant blending at the molecular level before reaction, and the reaction is completed in less than Tind and yields nuclei of the desired molecular composition. In this case:

Tmix < Tr < Tind

Agitator and speed selection can alter mixing time. However, Tr and Tind are system specific — with both being concentration dependent and Tind also being a function of supersaturation.

Control of local and global supersaturation, while required, is difficult at the feed point due to the low solubility of many compounds produced by reaction. Supersaturation can be reduced by mixing, as well as by a number of other parameters:

• reactant addition time — to maintain global supersaturation in the metastable zone;
• seed/crystal surface area — to decrease nucleation at the beginning of reactant addition, thereby preventing excessive nucleation that could limit growth of particles;
• the balance between addition rate and crystal surface area available for growth — maintaining an appropriate balance can avoid additional nucleation and a bimodal size distribution; and
• determining the impact of operating temperature on the particle-size distribution — higher temperatures often are beneficial as long as chemical degradation doesn't occur; cooling following the initial precipitation reaction then increases the yield based on the solubility curve.

Reactive crystallizations, due to the high local supersaturations, are subject to oiling out or agglomeration. The low solubility can cause a second liquid phase to form. The oil then can solidify into an amorphous solid or crystalline form. If this happens, agglomeration frequently occurs as a result of the adhesive oily phase holding particles together. Agglomeration yielding large structures of individual crystallites or amorphous solids can entrap impurities, reactants and solvents. At times, these structures have enough strength to survive filtration, washing and drying. At other times, the agglomerates are quite weak and disintegrate during mixing, pumping, filtration and drying.

The most effective approach for preventing oiling out and agglomeration is to ensure low supersaturation within the metastable zone, thereby supporting growth while minimizing nucleation. Excellent agitation, seeding and slow reactant addition can achieve that.

Nucleation rate dictates the final size distribution; if nucleation continues during the reactant addition, the mean crystal size can be small, perhaps a few microns, and broad with a potential bimodal distribution resulting from additional nuclei formation and the growth of existing crystals.

Seeding is an important parameter to avoid excessive nucleation and reduction in particle size. If the system is of low growth rate, seeding won't help as much. Keep in mind:

• The amount, size, surface area and surface properties of the seeds are critical.
• The seed amount should be at least 10–20% of the final crystal mass.
• The recommended seed size in most cases is approximately one-third to one-half of the desired final-product size.
• Seed should be added as a slurry or as a heel from the previous batch. Dry addition and milled seeds often don't work as well.

Often the inherent growth rate of organic compounds is slow, requiring reactant addition over extended periods to maintain supersaturation within the metastable zone. Higher addition rates can result in excessive nucleation and a bimodal distribution. Experiments in which the feed rate is increased while other parameters are held constant can determine the allowable addition rate. A number of programmed addition strategies have been proposed. One keeps the initial feed concentration low and then increases it as the reactant addition proceeds. This is similar to programmed cooling or programmed addition rate of antisolvent.

A number of software programs can handle the analysis and scaleup of mixing systems for crystallization and precipitations. One I've successfully employed is Visimix.

Such a program enables investigating different scenarios for scaleup as well as changes in agitator and vessel configuration. Table 1 presents the Visimix output for a geometric scaleup of a reaction crystallization from 50 gal to 6,250 gal, the first with constant power input to volume (P/V) and the second with constant tip speed. The vessels were baffled, with a dished head and a four-blade 45° pitched blade turbine. At completion there were 15% suspended solids in a saturated aqueous mother liquor and an average particle size of 150 microns with a maximum size of 250 microns. The slurry viscosity was 3 cP with a slurry density of 70 lb/ft3. The simulations clearly show the dramatic difference in hydrodynamic and turbulent values on scaleup and the impact of holding a particular parameter constant.

The software allows you to vary reactant concentration and feed position, thereby comparing the reaction time to the mixing time. The important issues to know are the energy of dissipation at the feed location and the direction of flow in this zone, both of which can be calculated by Visimix.

A better method for scaleup might be the use of different geometries and types of agitators for the pilot unit versus the commercial plant.

WAYNE J. GENCK is principal of Genck International, Park Forest, Ill. He answers crystallization questions on CP's Ask the Experts forum. E-mail him at genckintl@aol.com.

2 of 2 1 | 2 > View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.


No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments