A Troubled Process for Producing Surfactant Requires Considerable Change

Readers help sort out a sulfonation in shambles.

Share Print Related RSS
Page 2 of 2 1 | 2 Next » View on one page

If energy balance calculations show additional changes are needed, it may be necessary to add a smaller TV for split-range control of the reactor chiller temperature during the transition periods between steady operation and shutdown.

A threat from your regeneration service company should not be taken lightly. One word from them and you're out of business. I see filters in your future. You can approach the spent-acid-contamination problem in two ways: a side-stream filtration for a modest problem or full-stream filtration. A hot water wash prior to filtration could help improve separation by avoiding gelling in the acid.

Perform laboratory tests to identify the maximum pore size that will produce clear acid in combination with the optimum pre-treatment. Then, work backward to satisfy the service company, balancing economics and quality.

Cleaning up the product may be easy once the source of trouble is identified. The entire process should be shut down and flushed of contaminants. Pay attention to the heat exchangers, especially as they may have significant fouling that has gone undetected. After the temperature control problem is ameliorated, the contaminant in the solid should go away. If not, you may want to take samples from the separator, adding filtration prior to neutralization when a slurry is produced, and a wash-centrifuge step prior to the spray dryer.

There is no reasonable explanation for the corrosion failure of the Coriolis meter. Check valves leak, and if corroded badly, springs fail to close and acid flows back into the line supplying alkyl benzene. Install a backflow preventer to avoid liquid backflow of the H2SO4. It's doubtful that the acid vapor can be so easily contained. The only idea that comes to mind is a cold water wash followed by decanting; the acid vapor would go into the water but some trace alkyl benzene will be lost.

You will want to chase the corrosion backward to the piston pump. These pumps are expensive to replace and long on delivery. In the end, it may be much easier to upgrade the pipe specification if the corrosion problem continues.
Dirk Willard, consultant
Wooster, Ohio

My refinery is grappling with how to set up the coolers for reducing oil sample temperatures for safe handling. These coolers usually consist of a U-tube inside a water jacket. The tubing is rated for 2,000 psig at 600°F; the shell maximum allowable working pressure is 75 psig at 600°F. We're working with heavy gas oil from a coker at 400°F. An alternative that's been suggested is to use a tube inside a tube: ¼-in. tubing for the oil within 1-in.tubing for the cooling-tower water. The project engineer wants hydrostatic pressure relief valves (PSVs) installed for blocked-in water. The maintenance engineer is pushing for the tube-in-tube approach because he insists it won't need a PSV; he claims it is protected under ASME code because the cooler diameter is less than 6-inch. Who's right? How should we proceed?

Send us your comments, suggestions or solutions for this question by January 10, 2014. We'll include as many of them as possible in the February 2014 issue and all on ChemicalProcessing.com. Send visuals — a sketch is fine. E-mail us at ProcessPuzzler@putman.net or mail to Process Puzzler, Chemical Processing, 1501 E. Woodfield Road, Suite 400N, Schaumburg IL 60173. Fax: (630) 467-1120. Please include your name, title, location and company affiliation in the response.

And, of course, if you have a process problem you'd like to pose to our readers, send it along and we'll be pleased to consider it for publication.

Page 2 of 2 1 | 2 Next » View on one page
Share Print Reprints Permissions

What are your comments?

You cannot post comments until you have logged in. Login Here.


  • I see two major problems right off the bat if the FD presented is truly reflective of the alkyl benzene (AB) sulfonation process.

    First, the oleum and AB feeds must be added individually to the bulk reactor content, preferably into a high flow circulating loop. AB sulfonations are typically conducted in loop reactors. The inline premixing of oleum and AB will definitely aggravate color regardless of flow ratios.

    Second, I see no water addition to the separator which is needed to reduce the H2SO4 content to the required 70 - 80% by weight for improved settling/separation of the layers. Without the water dilution, the loss of sulfonic acids to the spent H2SO4 will greatly increase color bodies (black residue) removal of which is required by the acid regenerator.

    I suggest seeking assistance with industry specialist.


  • H2SO4+CuO->H2O+CuSO4 Are you using copper Tubing? If the reaction energy exceeds the activation Energy for cupric sulfate formation consider lining The tubing near the reactor.


  • Hi Tom,

    RE: water addition to separators As the author of the puzzle I should point out that I often leave things out to allow the readers to catch a problem. I am well aware that water is required for the separator. Good catch.


RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments