Effectively Clean Tanks and Reactors

Choose the right equipment to avoid costly contamination problems.

By Anthony Wood, Spraying Systems Co.

3 of 4 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 View on one page

Sparking or explosion risks. Explosion-proof electric motors are available or you can use an air motor. Or you may be able to change cleaning solvents to eliminate the explosion hazard without negatively impacting cleaning. Other options include increasing humidity in the vessel to minimize the risk of static electricity, prevent complete drying of the residue and ease residue removal.

Fluid-driven machines generally cost less than motor-driven ones, although the cost depends upon the size of the machine. However, fluid-driven machines have many internal parts and disassembly, replacement and reassembly of worn parts can be time-consuming. In some cases, maintenance requires a special tool kit. Factory refurbishing usually is recommended based on hours of use.

Motor-driven machines require minimal maintenance and are serviced easily by the user. The motors are positioned outside the tank, ensuring long life and minimal exposure to harmful solvents.

[Avoid Costly Materials Mistakes]

Which is a better choice? Fluid-driven machines usually cost less. Motor-driven machines are less expensive to operate and maintain. The specifics of your operation such as water quality and hours of use will determine which is more cost-effective.

If you've determined that a motor-driven cleaner is your best choice, you must select between two types:

1. Machines with nozzles in a fixed position. These can be permanently installed or moved from vessel to vessel but the cleaning head is in a fixed position on the unit. Maximum operating pressure is 5,000 psi. Various types of motors are available and users specify extension length, flange size and a two- or four-nozzle hub.

2. Machines with retractable nozzles. These permanently installed units offer a higher level of automation (Figure 4). A pneumatic mechanism inserts and retracts the extension and the cleaning head. A control panel allows setting multiple stopping points between full insertion and full retraction to position the nozzles where more impact is required or to clean around obstructions. The control panel can be located away from the vessel for convenience or safety. Maximum operating pressure is 4,000 psi.

The properties of the residue or the cleaning agents and your desired level of automation will determine which option is best for your operation.


Acoustic Monitoring Device 
 Acoustic Monitoring Device
Figure 5. Unit mounted on onside of vessel detects loss
of rotation and variations in rotation speed and fluid pressure.

Once you've selected and installed a new cleaning machine, how do you know if it's doing its job?

Visual inspection is one option. Monitor the machine to make sure it's working and inspect the inside of the vessel when the cleaning cycle is complete. Swab or riboflavin tests are common ways to verify cleanliness. Of course, the viability of these approaches depends on the size and location of your vessel.

Another option is using an acoustic monitoring device (Figure 5). A sensor mounted to the exterior of the tank "listens" to the performance of the cleaning equipment and identifies variations from a pre-determined baseline. It instantly can detect rotation failure and changes in rotation speed or spray pressure and can notify operators via audible or visual alarms. The monitoring device also transmits performance documentation for quality control and record keeping. It obviates visual monitoring and post-cleaning tests.

3 of 4 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.


No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments