Process Puzzler: Make Solid Progress

Readers suggest ways to improve crystallizer controls.

Share Print Related RSS

THIS MONTH'S PUZZLER
We recover ammonium sulfate from a power plant scrubber and sell it as fertilizer. Temperature control of the liquor going to the crystallizer is critical; liquor is circulated through a shell-and-tube heater. Poor control causes nucleation, creating small crystals at the expense of large ones. The difference between the inlet and outlet stream temperatures must be ±1°F. Our customer originally insisted on using a controller temperature board in its central control room, which is more than 300 yards away, but now is demanding that we use K thermocouples. Will either idea work? What's the best way to get the accuracy needed?

GO WITH SCREENS
As byproduct recovery is involved, minimum expenditure is important. In my view, the ±1°F will not promote crystallization in the mother liquor. For fertilizer use, crystal size should not be critical unless packaging of the final product is a factor.

One common processing technique is to concentrate the liquor to a specific gravity and add seed crystal plus air shock, in combination with slow cooling. This will promote the desired large crystal growth. At end-point temperature, the vessel is discharged to a centrifuge for separation of the product; the mother liquor is recycled. This process is a little more complicated if continuous instead of batch. Drying and sizing over screens, e.g., for a 20–40 mesh cut, will obtain a uniform free-flowing product of the proper size. Another possible alternative would be to market a concentrated ammonium sulfate solution for use directly as fertilizer.
Robert Drucker, consultant
East Northport, N.Y.


FOCUS ON INSTRUMENTATION
This is an instrumentation problem as opposed to a crystallization/process problem. As observed in the plant, variations of greater than ±1°F can result in fines due to excessive flashing and nucleation in the crystallizer circuit. This is observed in many continuous systems since they are designed for a specific supersaturation level to stay within the metastable zone and thereby avoid undesired fines formation due to primary nucleation.

Assuming that their current process involves sending an ohm signal to the board in the control room 300 yards away, the signal is degrading due to line losses and electrical flux interferences from motors and power lines. The result is that the signal will not be accurate enough to maintain the desired and necessary 1° range. This would be a very old system.

Regardless of the temperature measuring device in the field, be it RTD or thermocouple, the field sensor should send a 4-to-20 ma signal to the control room to achieve the required accuracy when transmitting over such a long distance of 300 yards. This type of signal should not degrade.

An RTD or thermocouple should work. If a thermocouple, J or K is acceptable, but Type J is my personal preference.
Dr. Wayne Genck, crystallization consultant
Genck International, Park Forest, Ill.


USE A DIFFERENTIAL TRANSMITTER
Although using K-thermocouples throughout the plant may make inventory easier it won't solve your temperature control problem. Three-hundred yards is way too far for cables without a signal booster.

The only instrument that I would propose would be a four-wire resistance temperature detector (RTD). A three-wire RTD won't do better than ±2–5°F, as crystallizer manufacturers have admitted to me. This puzzle poses a more difficult challenge.

Loop control is based on a differential of two temperatures. Anytime a measurement is compared to another you introduce three potential errors: the elements, the transmitters and the interactions between them. This is why material balances and pressure drop calculations made using different instruments are often wrong.

There are two solutions: 1) a single transmitter for each measurement; or 2) install a differential transmitter. In the first case, the distributed control system would use a calculation block — which could be another source of error. In the second case, the differential transmitter could avoid transmitter error by taking signals from two different elements. Another reason for the four-wire RTD is compensation for corrosion or poor connections. Liptak's "Process Measurement and Analysis," Vol. 1, p. 574, states: "A single ohm of difference between the legs is reflected as a 4.7°F error."

To do the job you need two four-wire RTDs connected to a single differential transmitter. Another way to reduce lead wire error is with a constant current source whereby the resistance bridge is replaced by a digital voltage meter. Avoiding contact problems by using gold contacts also would help. Although this solution requires careful wiring, it might be the best option to meet customer requirements for large crystals.
Dirk Willard, consultant
Wooster, Ohio



SEPTEMBER'S PUZZLER
Gas temperature is gradually rising at the exit of our waste heat exchanger; the gas goes to a reactor and threatens to raise its catalyst bed temperature above the allowable limit. The exchanger extracts heat for steam from gas exiting a steam reformer (see Figure 1), whose feed rate of hydrogen and liquefied petroleum gas is steady. De-mineralized water is on the shellside; hot water, H2S, H2, CO2, CO are on the tubeside. An analysis of the shellside condensate shows traces of iron and phosphate; an analysis of the tubeside shows traces of iron, potash and silicon. There are some similarities with the analysis of the desulfurization catalyst but our supplier denies the possibility of broken catalyst. What's causing the fouling? How can we solve the problem?

Send us your comments, suggestions or solutions for this question by August 13, 2010. We'll include as many of them as possible in the September 2010 issue and all on www.ChemicalProcessing.com. Send visuals — a sketch is fine. E-mail us at ProcessPuzzler@putman.net or mail to Process Puzzler, Chemical Processing, 555 W. Pierce Road, Suite 301, Itasca, IL 60143. Fax: (630) 467-1120. Please include your name, title, location and company affiliation in the response.

And, of course, if you have a process problem you'd like to pose to our readers, send it along and we'll be pleased to consider it for publication.

Share Print Reprints Permissions

What are your comments?

Join the discussion today. Login Here.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments