Interested in linking to "The Good and Bad of OEE"?
You may use the Headline, Deck, Byline and URL of this article on your Web site. To link to this article, select and copy the HTML code below and paste it on your own Web site.
By David Berger, P.Eng., Contributing Editor to Plant Services
For the past 10 years, I've witnessed a steady rise in the interest senior management displays regarding asset management. This trend coincides with the increase in asset cost and complexity, especially plant equipment, making it even more important to manage assets well. Not surprisingly, in response to these trends, top management has been demanding greater visibility into asset health, better control of costs, and improved asset effectiveness. Therein lies the reason behind the steady popularity gain of measuring overall equipment effectiveness (OEE).
Definition
OEE is an asset's actual output divided by the theoretical maximum output, expressed as a percentage. The metric is commonly quantified as the product of availability times performance times quality.
This formula is based on the premise that there are three main impediments to achieving the theoretical maximum. First of all, if the asset experiences downtime and is unavailable to produce, then it can't achieve maximum output. Secondly, output is lower if the asset's performance is suboptimal. For example, it might be restricted to a lower speed than the theoretical maximum. Finally, even if the asset is always available and operates at full speed, a percentage of its output might be of unacceptable quality, thereby rendering it impossible to achieve the theoretical maximum output.
To read the rest of this article from Plant Services, visit: www.plantservices.com/articles/2009/032.html.
ChemicalProcessing.com focuses exclusively on serving professionals designing and operating plants in the chemical industry. The unique content helps you make your sites as efficient, safe, environmentally friendly and economically competitive as possible.