Interested in linking to "Use water to check vessel integrity "?
You may use the Headline, Deck, Byline and URL of this article on your Web site. To link to this article, select and copy the HTML code below and paste it on your own Web site.
By Andrew Sloley, contributing editor
Pressure testing is a vital step in equipment maintenance and modification. When everything goes well, we have confidence in equipment integrity. However, a failed pressure test creates safety concerns. We must design our equipment, develop testing procedures and implement safety steps that assume failure can occur. After all, if we knew equipment would pass every time — there wasn’t any possibility of failure — we wouldn’t have to pressure test at all.
The most important decision in pressure testing is what to select as the test fluid. Most vessels are tested with either air or water. Sometimes other gases (e.g., nitrogen) or liquids are used but these cases are rare. Air and water have overwhelming benefits in being cheap, readily available and safe to handle.
The major safety issue in selecting between air and water is what happens if the vessel fails. Pneumatic energy release is much greater than hydrostatic energy release because air expands much more than water when pressure containment fails.
Even so, some plants use air for pressure testing. Water contaminates specific processes. If you put water in a sensitive process and can’t get it out again, water may not be a choice.
Water testing is more complex than air testing. You must configure the equipment and piping to allow for correctly filling, holding and draining the water. In spite of the added complexity, I prefer the safer approach of using water whenever possible.
Here are some of my guidelines and design criteria for using water for pressure testing. Many of these points are especially important in dealing with tall vessels, such as the 130-ft. tall distillation column depicted in Figure 1. There, the water height adds 56 psi of static pressure on the bottom.
The tower in Figure 1 poses five potential trouble spots for a hydrostatic pressure test: two sections of valve trays, two sections with internal partitions creating potential dead spots, as well as the extra 56 psi of static pressure on the bottom.
Restricting fill and drain rates to appropriate values will prevent damage to the valve trays. The dead spots require either internal venting or external venting through nozzles to prevent the relatively weak internals from bearing excessive load (when filling) or having a partial vacuum pulled (when draining). It’s crucial to account for the static head from the vessel height in setting MAWP and test pressures. The vessel was successfully pressure tested with all internals in place by taking all factors into account and allowing for them.
Featured Sponsor
Water is a safe, reliable medium for pressure testing. However, like all other plant work, such testing takes planning and thought to correctly design the equipment and piping.
ChemicalProcessing.com focuses exclusively on serving professionals designing and operating plants in the chemical industry. The unique content helps you make your sites as efficient, safe, environmentally friendly and economically competitive as possible.