Interested in linking to "The chemical industry needs fresh eyes"?
You may use the Headline, Deck, Byline and URL of this article on your Web site. To link to this article, select and copy the HTML code below and paste it on your own Web site.
By Mark Rosenzweig, editor in chief
What do a former Secretary of State, a doctor at the Mayo clinic, and the head of a downtown-development group have in common? They all served on the Independent Safety Review Panel formed to investigate BP after the March 2005 explosion at the company’s Texas City, Texas, refinery that took 15 lives. So, too, did Dennis C. Hendershot, who I’ve known for years and who is the process safety guru for Ask the Experts on ChemicalProcessing.com. So, I contacted him to get an insider’s perspective on this unusual and high profile panel.
“Every member made an important contribution,” he stresses. For instance, the politicians and lawyers understood how to say exactly what was intended, factually and objectively, and brought experience in managing culture in large organizations. The people from other industries contributed knowledge of accident investigation, which differs in approach and techniques from usual chemical industry practice. “They go more into systematic causes — going beyond operators’ errors… The chemical industry doesn’t delve into root causes as much,” he notes. The person from the union helped get workers to talk freely and to participate in a corporate culture survey. “One thing that amazed me was how well the group worked together. It was a consensus, unanimous report,” he adds.
ADVERTISEMENT
BP set up the panel after the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) in August 2005 issued its first-ever urgent safety recommendation — for an independent team to assess the safety culture and oversight at BP’s five North American refineries. The 11-member panel, which has just published its findings and recommendations (see Panel blasts BP's safety practices), consisted of:
It was a massive effort. Dennis reckons that he averaged about 15 hr/wk working on the panel for the 15 months it existed, and that this was typical.
Dennis certainly sees a wider role for chemical industry “outsiders” in safety efforts, not just for accident investigations but even for process safety audits. In some cases, getting a person from outside the particular company might suffice. For significant events, though, he recommends bringing in people from other high-risk, high-tech industries.
You don’t need to be an outsider to see that’s sage advice.
ChemicalProcessing.com focuses exclusively on serving professionals designing and operating plants in the chemical industry. The unique content helps you make your sites as efficient, safe, environmentally friendly and economically competitive as possible.