How Can We Better Control an Exotherm? | Chemical Processing

Share Print Related RSS
Page 1 of 3 « Prev 1 | 2 | 3 View on one page

We have to hold tight temperature control on a highly exothermic suspension polymerization process in order to maximize reaction rates. We tried using PID on the catalyst flow, but temperature fluctuation was too high. We added PID control to the cooling water and can now control the temperature within +/-5 Degrees C, but now the batch time is too long. What can we do to achieve tighter control on this kind of process?

,"From August Chemical Processing

 

Focus on heat transfer

where subscript R refers to the reactor conditions and subscript c refers to the coolant conditions. It is critical to note that in polymerization reactions the rate of reaction, R, is typically a highly nonlinear function of both TR and the catalyst feed rate, C, while the cooling capacity is determined by the flow of coolant. In addition, the ability to cool the reactor is limited by the reactor surface area and the overall heat transfer coefficient.

There are a number of options to improve reactor cooling.

First, one may marginally improve the overall heat transfer coefficient by increasing agitation speed. Since the main purpose of the agitation is to maintain the suspension, a higher agitator speed should not hurt the process, although it might improve the mass transfer from the bulk liquid into the reaction sites and result in a higher reaction rate. Higher turbulence at the wall will enhance the heat transfer slightly, but I believe that this would not be sufficient to improve control and reduce batch time.

Second, one can change to a cooling media with a higher heat capacity. This option will be capital intensive in that a new system is required.

Third, by adding a pump-around loop to the reactor vessel one can add additional heat exchange surface by either jacketing the pump around or putting a heat exchanger in-line. This option might not be practical due to increased maintenance resulting from fouling the heat exchange area.

Fourth, find a suspending fluid that will boil at the appropriate reaction temperature to take advantage of the latent heat effects. The vapors should be condensed and returned to the vessel. This will require an intensive development effort.

Fifth, scale down the process. A smaller reaction vessel will have a larger surface area to volume ratio. This will have the effect of increasing the heat transfer capability of the reactor, and ultimately allow shorter batch times with better temperature control. In addition, two smaller reactors will probably provide more throughput than a single reactor of equivalent size. This option might be difficult to sell to management due to capital investment and the potential for higher operational cost brought on by increasing the number of operators.
Keith Dackson, Ph.D., Engineering Scientist
Henkel Technologies/Loctite Electronics, Olean, N.Y.
We successfully scaled up a highly exothermic and "unusual" batch isomerization reaction from 1 liter in a calorimeter to a 30-gal. pilot-scale batch and from there to a 500-gal. full-scale reaction. We were able to abandon a $20-MM plant modification based on a continuous reactor and substituted a $5-MM (1980s $$) modification based on a couple of batch reactors.

Learn From a scale up

I would proceed as follows:

Run the reaction in a batch-heat-flow/heat-compensation calorimeter. This let's you run the reaction under conditions where the heat-transfer surface to reaction-volume ratio is very large. You can run the reaction in batch or semibatch mode; you can add the catalyst all at once, or add it slowly, i.e., you can explore heat evolution (and yields) as a function of time under various conditions. Since heat evolution is always some function of reaction rate, you're actually getting a real-time view of the reaction kinetics.

Once you have these data, first determine how large a surface-to-volume ratio you need to prevent a runaway reaction. (Remember - batch reactions are always potential bombs, since during an upward temperature excursion, the heat transfer capability increases linearly with cooling media

Add even more heat transfer area so that you can run at a relatively small

Even if you only have a jacket, you must pump the cooling media around - so that it is essentially isothermal. The cooling loop acts as big flywheel. Cooling media temperature is adjusted by adding coolant to the pump-around loop and bleeding off an equivalent amount.

Should the cooling media become too cold (e.g., during a process interruption), you need the capability of heating the pump around loop to get the reaction started again.

Initially, when our ChEs tried to run the isomerization on a 10 gal. scale, they ended up with two runaways out a total of four reactions. And even for the successful ones, it was like balancing an egg on a pin.

Page 1 of 3 « Prev 1 | 2 | 3 View on one page
Share Print Reprints Permissions

What are your comments?

You cannot post comments until you have logged in. Login Here.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments