To understand what new filtration products are emerging in the chemical process industry, you first need to distinguish between disruptive filtration technology and a simple tweak to or minor improvement of an existing product or process.
Disruptive technologies are commonplace. Instant photography, for example, was offered as a replacement for 35-mm film. It later was "disrupted" when digital cameras came along, which require no film at all. Manufacturers of fuel cells are developing disruptive technology to supplant the internal combustion engine. In chemical filtration, a similar step-jump must occur before the technology can be deemed "new and emerging."
This article highlights new or emerging filtration media and discusses their potential impact on some common chemical applications.
DURAPEX PET N2030 PM2.5 filter media (left) vs. 16-ounce-per-square-yard standard needfelt PET
Photo courtesy of Polymer Group Inc.
Cleaning exhaust air
Baghouse filters are used widely in many process industries to clean exhaust air in manufacturing environments. Among the many uses for these filter systems are to remove chemical dust in powder processing, metal fines in foundries, particles from abrasive processing applications and cement dust at cement manufacturing centers.
Woven fabrics from wool and cotton were the first primary filtration media. Later, rayon was used. Then, as synthetic fibers became available after World War II, polyester and nylon woven fabric filter bags captured the market. Needlefelt fabrics disrupted woven fabrics. In certain cases, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) foamed coatings or microporous membranes laminated to needlefelt substrates then replaced needlefelt fabrics.
Each development was an improvement over the incumbent filtration medium and was disruptive to the manufacturers of the previous fabric media.
PTFE membranes and, to a lesser extent, PTFE and other foams laminated to or coated over needlefelt fabrics have eliminated the inherent problems caused by the large gaping holes in needlefelt fabrics. These membranes and coatings have become a huge success, but at a cost of up to 10 times the price of needlefelt fabrics. In spite of this high cost, membrane customers have been willing to take this route for improved product performance.
Another disruptive technology is now on the horizon. A new kind of nonwoven fabric is emerging that is not from needlefelt fabric or PTFE foam or membranes, but instead from hydroentangled nonwoven fabrics ," Durapex fabrics ," from an entirely new set of suppliers.
Hydroentangled nonwoven fabrics are constructed in a similar fashion to needlefelt fabrics, but with critical differences. Instead of barbed needles, which penetrate the web to entangle the fibers during the manufacture of needlefelt nonwoven fabric, very fine high-pressure water jets are used to produce hydroentangled nonwoven fabrics.
The water jets entangle the fibers, but unlike the hard metal needles used to construct needlefelt nonwoven fabrics, do not severely damage the fibers. Broken fibers in needlefelt constructions not only produce a weak fabric, but also cause premature bag failures. Broken fibers frequently break free and drift downstream whenever the baghouse filter is under any stress.
A second advantage of hydroentangled fabrics is that the hydroentangling process does not produce large needle holes or an uneven fiber distribution. Anyone who has examined the surface of a needlefelt fabric probably has observed this deficiency, which is represented by thousands of pot-marked holes across the surface. This moonscape-like surface causes the airflow in needlefelt fabric filters to be very uneven across and throughout the web. Preferential airflow naturally seeks the larger needle holes, while minimal airflow is available across those portions of the filter's surface without the needled holes.
This occurrence is problematic because the non-needled portions of the needlefelt fabric filter surface are intended to be the workhorse area. The mechanical needling that holds the filtration media together creates the holes or pores, which determine the efficiency and effectiveness of the filter itself. This phenomenon becomes a particular problem during filter system start-up and even more so later when the large particles, lodged in the needle hole pores, dislodge and off-load downstream.
Repeated cycles of loading and off-loading also contribute to premature filter failure. The endless loading and off-loading of particles also prevent the much denser non-needle-hole portions of the fabric from fully serving as the medium's intended filtering region. These areas are relatively dense and are not where air is first apt to flow, especially when large holes are readily available. In essence, the needle holes, not the pores between the non-needled portion of the fabric, control or limit the needlefelt's filtration capability.
It could be argued that the large holes eventually plug with dirt, and that those portions without the holes do the workhorse filtration. However, by the time this plugging occurs, the differential pressure of the media reaches such a high level that the useful life of the filter is all but spent.
Through another advance in the disruptive development chain, hydroentangled nonwoven fabrics are emerging that have 60 percent of the weight of needlefelt fabrics, but boast similar strength and other mechanical properties. Fiber distribution throughout the medium is incredibly uniform because the pores produced by the hydroentangling forming process are similar in size and configuration to the surrounding pores formed by the fibers themselves. In turn, airflow is even ," without the large gapping holes.
Hydroentangled nonwoven fabrics are reported to perform at levels near PTFE microporous membranes and foamed coatings in all regards, including efficiency and cloth-to-air ratios, but at a price similar to needlefelt nonwoven fabrics. End-users and plant maintenance crews now have a new tool to achieve high efficiency and uniformity at an affordable cost.